And this is just one of the many reasons why. I keep seeing crap about the Buffalo shooter illegally “modifying” his Bushmaster XM-15 rifle (when some dumbass isn’t calling it an “AR-15” which happens to be a Colt trademark). Case in point:
Buffalo shooting suspect learned to modify his gun on YouTube. The videos are still online.
The 18-year-old suspected of targeting and fatally shooting 10 Black people in Buffalo, New York, wrote in what are believed to be his online journals that he learned how to illegally modify his rifle by watching YouTube videos. The suspect appeared to link to the videos in Discord chat logs, and the videos were still available on YouTube as of Thursday evening — five days after the shooting.
The advocacy group Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund called on YouTube to remove these videos, saying that they violate YouTube’s community guidelines banning videos that show how to install gun accessories like high-capacity magazines.
Since thus far the only “modification” I’ve heard about is that he had 10+ round magazines, I was very curious as to exactly how he “modified” the rifle. What do the supergeniuses at Everytown say?
Based on a review of the shooter’s writings and public news reports about the weapon used in the shooting, the shooter may have watched this video to equip his Bushmaster rifle with an Anderson Manufacturing magazine release after removing the Mean Arms MA Lock in violation of New York’s assault weapons regulations.
Ah. So Everytown believes the chumbucketmight have removed the magazine lock and installed a conventional magazine catch so that he could swap out magazines in a normal manner.
I’ll pause for a moment, to see if you can spot the problem with that. It’s possible you won’t, if you live in neither New York… nor California.
All “assault weapons” are not created equal. Except in a few jurisdictions that have defined the term in law, it’s meaningless. For instance, In Georgia there is no such thing as an “assault weapon.”
In California, the powers-that-be decided that you should not be able to swap magazines normally. There, an AR-pattern rifle must be equipped with a magazine lock that makes normal operation impossible. So if the Buffalo, New York scumbag wanted to travel to California, purchase a California-compliant rifle, and modify it to allow normal mag swaps, he might want to remove an MA Lock and replace it with an AA mag release.
But New York does not ban mag releases, as California does (I’m open to correction, if someone can find such a restriction in the law). They just say you can’t insert a magazine with a capacity greater than 10 rounds.
So the Buffalo bastard would have zero reason to “modify” his rifle by removing a feature not there in the first place, and replacing it with a feature it already has.
The Everytown dimwits assumed that As California Goes, So Goes the Country. If California requires something then surely every other state must do the same, right?
Nope.
It is possible that the Bushmaster the shooter purchased was California compliant as well as New York compliant. The manufacturer/distributor could have simplified production by combining the worst of both states, just so they wouldn’t have complicate their production lines with two products, each with limited appeal. To date, I have not seen a picture of the specific firearm used; I don’t know if it was dual-compliant.
But that doesn’t make the Cal-required mag lock the law in New York. In NY, installing a normal mag release would not be an “illegal modification.”
Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)
“At this point, in this closely-divided Congress, do you see any appetite right now to take up, once again, the idea of an assault weapons ban in this country?”
The question was clearly a pre-planned softball for the half-witted Dim. The scumbag reportedly used a NY SAFE Act-compliant Bushmaster XM-15 rifle; a non-“assault weapon.”
The ditz still flubbed it.
We need to do something about making sure that bad guys don’t get their hands on handguns.
The context was the Buffalo shooting. He did not use a handgun; it was a NY SAFE Act-compliant Bushmaster XM-15 rifle.
And we need to make sure that these assault and automatic weapons don’t get in the hands of bad guy
One more time, moron: It was not an “assault weapon.” It was not an automatic weapon (something even NY Gov. Hochul could figure out).
And now we enter the Twilight Zone. Picking up where she left off…
And we need to make sure that these assault and automatic weapons don’t get in the hands of bad guys, and sometimes, bad women. Because, again, I’ve been rabbit hunting.
-blink- Um, what? Let’s simplify that.
We need to get guns out of the hands of bad women because I’ve been rabbit hunting.
Aaaall righty, then.
So now I come to the questions I think Garcia should answer.
1. Are you on drugs?
Because you sound like you’re on drugs. And not prescription goodies. On the other hand…
2. If you are not on drugs, should you be? (The prescription sort, this time.)
3. If neither recreational nor prescription pharmaceuticals were involved, is your stupidity natural or the result of an accident?
I could add a fourth question prompted by this:
Handguns, in my view, are not for hunting. They’re not for protection. I think handguns are, frankly, for killing people.
Oddly enough, I have never killed anyone with a handgun. I even bought one large-bore handgun specifically for hunting. I have used a handgun for defense. So…
4. Are my non-killing handguns defective, and should I demand refunds?
The first three questions were submitted to Garcia’s office. They did not respond to multiple emails.
Go figure.
Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses. Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)
Passed to the governor for signature a day ahead of the announced schedule, depending largely on his political ambitions, not merit or lack, for passage. Next probable and equally “logical” step: Unregulated firearm ownership for every man, woman and child in America.
The weirdly disjointed sentence structure, and the peculiar “logical” leap from “one state passed Constitutional Carry” to “totally unregulated firearm ownership for absolutely everyone in America” was an instant warning that I was reading the ravings of a not-entirely sane person. I scrolled down to see who this Paul Shriver is.
Paul Shriver, EdD, is a forensic and clinical psychologist.
Sad to say, but in my experience (and others*) psychologists have a strong tendency to be b–f— nuts. As you’ll see, this appears to be the case with Shriver. Couple that with a pointless EdD, and we have a perfect storm of irrationality. He doesn’t have both oars in the water. The elevator doesn’t go to the top. Pick a metaphor.
Firearm use is by definition a violent act (homicide when a human is the recipient) and has no place in civilized society.
He seems to be unaware of target practice; which would explain another statement he makes later. He also seems to think that humans invariably, without exception die when shot. Chicago says otherwise.
No reasonable person could possibly imagine that expressing one’s feelings or opinions with a bullet could be equivalent to “free speech” or even exist as a “right” on the same piece of paper.
Projecting much, Shriver? Offhand, I don’t recall ever firing a round to express an opinion.
But let’s get to the meat.
The only real solution must begin with the repeal of the 2nd Amendment in its entirety and without delay. It might then be re-written in clear language as a privilege to be strictly regulated — the details to be worked out later by usual democratic means.
Never mind that the Supreme Court has already found that it is a right, not a privilege; and that it pre-dates the Amendment he finds so bothersome. And he seems to be ignoring Indiana’s own pesky constitution.
Section 32. The people shall have a right to bear arms, for the defense of themselves and the State.
He’ll be needing to convince his neighbors to repeal that one, too. Based on my time living in Indiana, I’d say not damned likely.
In the interim, of course, all guns in current ownership, manufacture, storage, etc., would need to be recalled, and if not “re-legalized,” eliminated. Some current types and uses, would be restored, regulated and licensed as appropriate with little real inconvenience. Thus, this idea is not anti-gun per se, nor in any sense extreme.
Repealing the Second Amendment and confiscating all firearms in the country is anti-gun. And it sounds pretty damned extreme. And about as “anti-gun” as one could get.
Hmm. No exception there for police. Universal disarmament. hat should be interesting.
Meanwhile, I and my personal gun: Locked, no bullets, single action, and not very accurate (and therefore little threat) remain very truly yours for peace, good will, and universal disarmament in our times.
I imagine the “not very accurate” issue lays mainly in his lack of practice, since he wouldn’t want to violently attack a peice of paper. But if all firearm use is violence, why does he have one? Perhaps Paul Shriver should be red flagged, starting his “universal disarmament” with himself.
* I knew a woman with a doctorate in psychology. She once told me she left the field — research psychology — when she realized that most of her peers were nuts. She also told me that clinical psychologists are worse.
If killing people has become legal — a bit of news I somehow missed — I’d pay a premium for a Hogg-hunting tag. Not that I’d use it; it would just be worth it for Hogg to simply know he was a lawful target of the people whose rights he wants to violate.
If you need a license to kill deer why don’t you need one to kill humans?
Let’s look at his other non sequiturs.
If you need a license to drive car, cut hair or to hunt you ought to need one to buy a gun.
I only need a license to drive a car on public streets. I don’t need a license to buy one.
I need a license to cut hair professionally, not to buy clippers or cut my own hair or that of family members.
I need a license to hunt some game, not to buy a gun.
There is something of a difference between buying a tool, and using said tool in a specific manner.
But Hogglet is to too g-ddamned stupid to grasp that.
Your right to own a gun with little regulation matters a lot less to me than the rights my classmates had before they were killed.
What do my rights have to do with what a known criminal in another state did to your classmates?
It’s been a while since I delved into the murky world of scholarly pro-victim-disarmament papers. Let’s take a look at Can States Block or Heavily Restrict the Second Amendment Constitutional Right by Following the Design of Texas Bill 8? (PDF). Basically, the weirdos compare the alleged right to abortion to the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms (yet oddly keep talking about licensure). The paper is a difficult to read mess, mainly — I suspect — because they have no frickin’ clue what they’re talking about.
In this research we ask three interrelated questions. First, does the Second Amendment right constitute an afront to International Law’s right to life under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“UDHR”) and the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights (“ICCPR”)? If yes, can states adopt a design similar to Texas Bill 8 to ban or extensively regulate the second amendment right? Finally, what are the intrinsic differences between the right to bearing arms and the right to abortion? If they are intrinsically different, this research calls for examining each of them under a different scrutiny standard. In order to answer the last question, we assess two landmark cases regarding abortion and right to bear arms currently pending before the US Supreme Court, in an attempt to predict the future of those rights.
At the first glance, it follows from a logical point of view that allowing anyone in the street to possess lethal weapons only results in more homicides, assassinations, and general chaos even when initial purchasers meet the arm licensing conditions. [emphasis added]
Only?
Yet the potential dangers surrounding bearing arms did not enter public discourse until after the assassination of John F. Kennedy in 1963.
Not until 1963? I seem to recall something in 1934.
Money quote:
Taking our findings into account, we argue that the US Supreme Court should assess the right to abortion under a strict scrutiny standard, and the right to bearing arms under an intermediate scrutiny standard.
So abortion, not a right until 1973 — and not to be found enumerated anywhere in the Constitution should be given strict scrutiny. But a right recognized by states prior to the Constitution and specifically enumerated therein for more than two centuries should only get intermediate scrutiny?
The second practical concern was to guarantee personal and state autonomy against the federal government. This was influenced by John Locke’s thesis legitimizing revolution against oppression or injustices.36 By examining these practical concerns in the 21st century, they seem to be largely hyper-vigilant. Further, these practical concern could easily be rebutted by the distinction between militia’s right in bearing arms (which is currently substituted by the police force) and bearing arms for personal self-defense.
Ah, NO; the “police force” is not the militia. One might expect a law professor to know something about the law, particularly in an area he chose to write about. But clearly he doesn’t:
Perhaps the majority created this exception on a misreading of history regarding the ban of shotguns and machineguns…
When did that happen? I was aware of registration requirements for machineguns and short-barreled shotguns (the previously linked National Firearms Act of 1934), but when did this alleged ban happen? Anyone? Bueller?
Dear Bog, they even slipped in this BS argument:
In contrast, an accurate originalist interpretation of the second amendment would lead to a contrary result: namely, banning most firearms currently existing since they are not the same – technologically – as the ones existed in the 18th century when James Madison and Thomas Jefferson drafted the second amendment.
The next victim-disarming idiot who uses a smart phone connected to a computer network operating over fiber optic lines to tell me the framers of the Constitution and the Second Amendment never envisioned modern firearms, and that the Second Amendment only protects muskets is getting bitch-slapped.
James Madison, known for his role in drafting the Bill of Rights (including that pesky 2A) lived through the rise of repeating firearms, breechloaders, paper cartridges, percussion caps, metallic cartridges, pinfire cartridges, centerfire cartridges, revolvers, and mass production of firearms.
Consider yourselves slapped, bitches. And recall that repeating firearms predated the very existence of the United States. By centuries. These folks’ knowledge of history is matched only by their knowledge of federal law. Well, lead author Yacoub is an “International Lawyer” practicing in Egypt, so perhaps there’s some slight excuse for his ignorance. But Briggs claims to be a practicing US attorney; G-d save her clients.
Section II of this paper gets interesting, in a morbid way. Now they bring up the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights — more a hash of muh socialism and a checklist of things governments can do to their citizens, than a bill of individual rights — and argue that it trumps the Second Amendment, because life. You see, keeping and bearing arms somehow violates someone’s right to life; but ending a life through abortion doesn’t.
The right to life was specifically mentioned in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR); regional conventions such as the American Convention on Human Rights among others.90 Invoking the right to life was very influential in abolishing the death penalty in many nations.91 Yet the indirect relationship between the right to life and the US constitutional right to bear arms remains unexplored to a large extent.
In the HRC General Comment No. 36 issued in 2018, paragraph four, in particular, connects the right to life and states’ obligation to implement policies so a person is not arbitrarily deprived of their life. “[A]rticle 6 of the Covenant provides that no one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life and that the right shall be protected by law.
No.
Under the Convention, gun control is essential to protecting the right to life. While persons can claim self-defense of the individual person as an exemption to criminal responsibility, it does not trump the fundamental right to life that is inherent in international human rights law.109 Even if there was a so-called “right to self-defense,” States still have a positive legal obligation under the Convention to implement gun control measures to protect their citizens in the collective sense and not the right of one individual to carry a gun.
I said, “No.” An aggressor’s “right to life does not trump my right to self defense — protecting my own life, BTW. And defending myself against a specific individual who attacks me is not arbitrary; I’m not randomly shooting every sixth person that walks past.
I really wanted to analyze this whole mess for you, so you wouldn’t have to. But I’m going to have to stop only a third of the way through, for the sake of my own sanity if nothing else. Feel free to read it yourself. But be aware that it only gets worse.
As a warning of what you’ll encounter, note that these two scholastic schizos have done a number of papers together. My personal morbid favorite is the one where they argue for the United States to adopt Sharia law to “solve the problem of US mass incarceration.”
Beating, hand-chopping and beheading as an alternative to prison time? That might make “the rehabilitative approach of the Icelandic criminal justice model part a bit tough to implement.
You know, color me suspicious. But the last time all the talking heads on TV, the politicians, Big Tech and celebrities all agreed on something and parroted the same talking points it was WuFlu. And our country and our world hasn’t yet recovered from that deception. Terrified people drive around in cars by themselves wearing masks. That scares me considering the physiological consequences of an elevated CO2 level. But oh yes, they were all in agreement, the 99+% survivable virus was going to decimate the earth, and there was no cure because Hydroxy and Ivermectin could not be used because Fauxci said so. No no, only the golden calf of a vaccine would do, and all voices trying to share information to the contrary would be shut down. Those people would be attacked and attempts made to ruin their lives, even as they were trying to save the lives of others. No longer is civil medical discussion allowed.
But this isn’t another covid column, yet.
Nope, this one is about helpful suggestions involving the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Just some observations.
What are my qualifications? Do I have superior knowledge that allows me to weigh in on such a dangerous topic? Ladies and gentlemen I present to you Vice President Kamala Harris:
Do I need to?
Quick history lesson for folks that probably don’t need it and could probably give me some.
The North Atlantic Alliance was founded in the aftermath of the Second World War. Its purpose was to secure peace in Europe, to promote cooperation among its members and to guard their freedom – all of this in the context of countering the threat posed at the time by the Soviet Union.
U.S. Secretary of State James Baker’s famous “not one inch eastward” assurance about NATO expansion in his meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev on February 9, 1990, was part of a cascade of assurances about Soviet security given by Western leaders to Gorbachev and other Soviet officials throughout the process of German unification in 1990 and on into 1991
Then of course there was that very impolite little US sponsored revolution under barry sotero in 2014 where the elected President of Ukraine (who was close to Russia) was thrown out and one favorable to the West and it’s taxpayer money was installed. Just seems rude and I can understand why Putin would take it amiss.
Victoria Nuland’s voice. That name will come up again.
I found this short clip by Dr Wilmer Leonard to be very interesting.
https://rumble.com/embed/vu8bq1/?pub=4
So as the talking heads call Putin crazy for saying there are nazis in the Ukraine, I might mention to them the Azov Battalion.
Russia/Putin know that President Puddin’ is corrupt. Heck the whole world (except your average dimocrat voter knows Xiden is corrupt) when he blackmailed Ukrainian prosecutors into ceasing the investigation into his criminal son, Hunter. Where is Hunter by the way?
But I think maybe there are a couple things that really got his knickers in a twist. One being, and a big one, the bio weapons labs that the Department of Defense has in the Ukraine. Bio weapons labs that have a connection to Eco Health Alliance, Tony Fauxci’s buddies. WHAT HAVE FAUCI’S FRIENDS BEEN UP TO IN UKRAINE?
The US has rejected Moscow’s allegation that it helps to operate “biolabs” in Ukraine working with highly dangerous pathogens. Russia claimed that Kiev is scrambling to destroy the materials and cover up a possible violation of the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).
“The United States does not own or operate any chemical or biological laboratories in Ukraine, it is in full compliance with its obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention and Biological Weapons Convention, and it does not develop or possess such weapons anywhere,” US State Department spokesperson Ned Price said on Thursday.
I’m sure she is afraid of that. Told you that name would pop up again.
Slutsky also noted that, on February 24, according to the Ukrainian-language documents produced by Russia, laboratory staff in Ukraine received an order to immediately destroy especially dangerous pathogens, including the causative agents of ‘plague, anthrax, tularemia, cholera’ and other deadly diseases.
But you really need to hand it to Putin’s intelligence services, how on earth did they ever discover what was going on in Ukraine before they even invaded? I mean what could have made him suspicious?
Oh I guess Putin watched a TED talk from 2017 huh?
Which is interesting since the corporate media has been lying, again, still, but this time telling us there are no bio labs in Ukraine.
Remember folks, our tax dollars pay Fauxci’s salary. And I’m pretty sure the Russians have watched his performance the last two years just like we have. Dangerous or cruel experiments in another country? Tony, really? You’d never would you? It was probably another bat, right?
Ok Ginger Goebbels (Jen Psaki) why don’t you just trot on over to Russia and lie to Putin and the Russian people like you do to Americans every day. Let us, U.S. know how that works out for you.
Weren’t Fauxci, Gates and Schwab talking about the next one, meaning pandemic? Maybe Putin took the “not in my backyard” approach.
Russia declared that the U.S. and Ukraine have covered up violations of the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention. This comes after Russia discovered bio-laboratories in Ukraine and after State Department official Victoria Nuland confirmed in her testimony on Tuesday that the U.S. has biolabs in Ukraine.
The Biological Weapons Convention, or Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, is a disarmament treaty that effectively bans biological and toxin weapons by prohibiting their development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling, and use.
Americans have expressed sympathy for Ukrainian amid the Russian invasion. Bars and restaurants have stopped serving Russian vodka, up to 3,000 Americans have joined the fight overseas, and now a Nassau County politician announced a gun collection drive to resupply Ukrainian Armed Forces with small arms.
GOP County Executive Bruce Blakeman announced the gun drive on Thursday and wants Long Islanders to donate their weapons.
“We want rifles, AR-15s, and shotguns.
“President Zelenskyy for the last few days has been begging weapons, begging for help. How could we sit by silently and not do our part?” Blakeman told ABC7 New York.
To those tempted to send them, you’re not getting them back and with President Puddin’ and the faculty lounge getting more brazenly dictatorial every day don’t bet they can be replaced.
So, my humble suggestions for ending this fiasco are:
Decertify the election, there is plenty of evidence. This will solve a plethora of problems. Too big a goal? Ok how about how about somebody stuff Harris in a closet. She urges Ukraine to join NATO and Russia invades. Wow, who could have seen that coming, right? So promise Putin, not that he’d believe any of us at this point, that Ukraine will never join NATO. Remove the bio weapons labs from Ukraine, put Tony Fauxci and his accomplices like Rick Bright, Francis Collins, Rachel Walensky on trial and in jail. The Corona Investigative Committee has already put together and conducted a grand jury hearing where the evidence has been presented. If Putin thinks we’re taking the bio weapons lab issue seriously that might help.
These are just a few simple things that the U.S. could do that would possibly help end the war without dragging any other countries into the middle, like Poland for instance. And besides it’s the right things to do. We should do them anyway. And considering the amount of actual useful fertilizer that comes from the Ukraine, as in the kind that is used to grow food, guess what President Puddin’s actions are going to do to the price and availability of food?
I know, it’s shocking I’ve never been appointed by a President to a diplomatic office, right?
For my work, I read a lot of legislation. Too much is mind-boggling stupid, but a few bills stand out even in that category. Rep. Ted Deutch [D-FL] and Sen. Ed Markey [D-MA] have mananaged to introduce what is possibly the stupidest bit of legislation since the failed Indiana attempt to set pi = 3.
I am speaking of companion bills H.R. 4225 and S. 2319, the “3D Printed Gun Safety Act of 2021”.
The “Findings” portion of the bills immediately tipped me off that something was very wrong with the mental state of whoever actually drafted this for the gullible congresscritters. Or it was the best prank in over a century. To wit,
(1) Three dimensional, or “3D” printing, involves the programming of a 3D printing machine with a computer file that provides the schematics for the item to be printed.
(2) Recent technological developments have allowed for the 3D printing of firearms and firearm parts, including parts made out of plastic, by unlicensed individuals in possession of relatively inexpensive 3D printers.
OK, we’re talking about plastic 3D printing, right? But why do we need this ban?
(5) On June 7, 2013, an assailant used a gun he had constructed by himself to kill his father, brother, and 3 other people at Santa Monica College in California. The person had failed a background check when he tried to purchase a gun from a licensed gun dealer. The gun he used was made from an unfinished AR–15-style receiver, similar to a receiver that can now be made with a 3D printer.
The bucket o’chum in the Santa Monica shooting didn’t use a 3D printed firearm. He used an AR-pattern firearm assembled from an 80% lower. You might be scratching your head over that conflation, but there’s a method in their madness.
I’ll skip past the points where our dedicated dipsticks conflated numberless homemade guns with commercially manufactured firearms with obliterated serial numbers, or how serial numbers on commercially manufactured firearms are merely “traditional” rather law, and go straight to the prohibition.
It shall be unlawful for any person to intentionally distribute, over the Internet or by means of the World Wide Web, digital instructions in the form of Computer Aided Design files or other code that can automatically program a 3-dimensional printer or similar device to produce a firearm or complete a firearm from an unfinished frame or receiver.”.
You may pause for a moment to giggle at the thought of transmitting a file over the World Wide Webwithout using the Internet, along with the plurality of periods.
Done?
Yes, whether self-directed morons or gullible dupes, Deutch and Markey are trying to ban the transmission of additive manufacturing 3D printer files for… subtractive manufacturing CNC mills.
I either want to b**ch-slap someone, or shake their hand.
[Permission to republish this article is granted so long as it is not edited, and the author and The Zelman Partisans are credited.]
Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, and general living expenses. Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)
You know, I really like the fashion of the 1930s. I feel they were very classic, flattering and stylish.
Pure class
And there were some great old movies in the 1930s. Among them: Gone With The Wind, King Kong, Pygmalion, Robin Hood, Stagecoach and of course, Mr. Smith Goes To Washington.
I think we need another Mr Smith to head to Washington DC STAT, as in January 20th.
While I love the fashion and movies of the 1930s, I am not loving the feeling of living in 1930s Germany. And I think we are.
The obligatory disclaimer, I’m not a doctor, I’ve never played one on TV, heck I didn’t even sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last night. But I do know a bit about medicine.
Once upon a time, if you went to a doctor about an illness, and you got bad news, or you just weren’t sure you completely trusted his opinion, you would get a “second opinion”. Some doctors even encouraged it. The same with lawyers, if you didn’t like what one had to say, consult with another one. Those days are gone. Now there is only one medical opinion allowed, no dissent will be tolerated and if you do so you risk your medical license. I also wonder why we bother asking anyone if they have any allergies, because hey, all bodies are just alike, right?
You will notice most of the video links are to Rumble, not YouTube. Because YouTube in it’s best censorship fashion doesn’t allow videos like these to be posted.
We have a regime in power that determined to force Americans to submit to their will. The “For the people act” will abolish “We The People” by legalizing the rampant voter fraud that took place in the last election. In addition to the complete and utter debacle in Afghanistan, I think the Xiden regime will go down in history (may it be soon, please G-d) as the one that decided to turn all of America into one giant lab, will many unwilling, and many uninformed participants. The participants being the lab rats. This is only one of the things that makes what is going on so detestable. There is a lot of information that is coming out about the experimental mRNA injection (it is not a vaccine, in case you didn’t know) but the majority of it is being censored.
You have the inventor of the PCR test saying it shouldn’t be used to diagnose disease and why. This video is about 16 minutes long and very informative. It even has a clip with the late Kary Mullis in it.
There is a lot coming out about the experimental gene therapy injection. It is gene therapy, because it alters your RNA, and once it’s in, it doesn’t come out. There really isn’t any going back.
As was mentioned in the video A clear counter argument, there was a Fakebook group with 65,000 injection injured people in it before it was inexplicably taken down.
The Moderna and Pfizer vaccine tests were conducted, as customary, with a control group; a group within the trial who were given a placebo and not the test vaccine. However, during the trial -and after the untested vaccines were given emergency use authorization- the vaccine companies conducting the trial decided to break protocol and notify the control group they were not vaccinated. Almost all the control group were then given the vaccine.
Purposefully dissolving the placebo group violates the scientific purpose to test whether the vaccine has any efficacy; any actual benefit and/or safety issues. Without a control group there is nothing to compare the vaccinated group against. According to NPR, the doctors lost the control group in the Johnson County Clinicial Trial (Lexena, Kansas) on purpose
If that doesn’t inspire confidence, I don’t know what could.
Perhaps the number of doctors far more credible that Tony Fauxci who have been censored and have been trying to warn people. People like Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA technology. Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Pfizer chief scientist, and others have been speaking out.
Wow! Who could have seen that coming? Oh wait, no one, because this crap is basically uncharted territory and there is nothing to compare it to, well, unless you want to count all the lab animals that died.
And in fact, the injection may be making things worse.
Hocus Pocus! They say that the Pfizer jab has been approved. Not so says Dr. Robert Malone (again, the inventor of the mRNA technology). There are two letters. One is for the Pfizer jab, and it is not approval. The approval is for Comirnaty, which doesn’t exist yet.
How you ask, could it be approved so quickly? From Dr Zev
Follow the Commissioners…
Scott Gottlieb – Former Commissioner of the FDA resigns and then goes to Pfizer to be on the board of directors.
Stephen Hahn – Replaces Gottlieb as FDA Commissioner and eventually resigns. He is now the Chief Medical Officer for Moderna.
Janet Woodcock – Wrongly advises Rick Bright (a fully-controlled individual) that HCQ is a dangerous drug requiring EUA that should be ONLY limited to hospitalized patients. Remember, all of the relevant clinical data at the time showed HCQ to be extremely effective in early treatment and NOT in hospitalized patients. Several months later Janet Woodcock replaces Stephen Hahn as the Commissioner of the FDA.
Is this all making sense yet?
All this plus more it’s no wonder people don’t want the experimental injection. And those trying to force tyranny down our throat do want it approved and fast. Not only to take the focus off Afghanistan, but because they think it will push people to want the injection. And remove a barrier to forcing it in us.
And force is certainly a word they are comfortable with, and desire to exercise more of it. Lots more of it. And that’s really the point of this column. With all the information I’ve listed, and questions that have been raised it is astonishing to see the lengths governments around the world are willing to go to in an effort to force this experimental substance into people. And they wonder why people are against their jab?
Australia, New Zealand and New South Wales appear to be ground zero for the harshest measures…..so far. But what makes it even more bizarre is the small number of deaths that are being used to justify their actions.
SYDNEY, Australia (LifeSiteNews) — A plan to jab 24,000 Australian teenagers at a mass vaccination site raised eyebrows after New South Wales Health Minister Brad Hazzard advised parents to “stay outside the arena” while their children were “ushered” inside by police officers and nurses.
In a video that was clipped and posted to social media, Hazzard told parents of teens invited to get their first jab at Qudos Bank Arena to stay outside while their children were given the experimental shot, which has been linked to serious possible side effects for young people, including myocarditis.
AUSTRALIA- 24,000 children will be vaccinated in a stadium next week. No parents will be allowed access.
Parents were assured their children would be well looked after and fine.
As schools reopened in Florida, several parents in Flagler County received weekend phone calls saying their children were on “a list” because they “may” have been exposed to someone who “may” have had COVID-19. Some parents were told their children could not return to school until they passed a series of COVID-19 tests. Other children were pulled from class and placed in isolation while parents were called and told to come pick them up “immediately.” The process has caused confusion and raised legal questions, leaving many parents feeling very angry.
On Aug. 8, Jessico Bowman—a director of the Florida Liberty Caucus—received a call from a person who claimed she was from the “health department.” She would not give her name. Nor would she identify which “health department” she represented.
“I regret to inform you that your daughter may have been exposed to COVID,” the woman said.
“I don’t have a daughter,” Bowman told the woman. “I have a son.”
And the CDC has plans for you as well, you “vaccine hesitant” person you. It’s called “shielding” and it amounts to a internment camp. And this is worth at least taking a look at so you understand what they are planning. By the way, the plan is dated July….of last year.
The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting.1,2 They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.
Current evidence indicates that older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions are at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19.3 In most humanitarian settings, older population groups make up a small percentage of the total population.4,5 For this reason, the shielding approach suggests physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population to prioritize the use of the limited available resources and avoid implementing long-term containment measures among the general population.
But before the isolation of the “camps”, we are seeing the medical apartheid of tyranny show its ugly head. The government is using private sector to enforce it. There are videos of police going from table to table in France asking to see people cell phone with their green passport at outdoor dining restaurants. Healthcare works who were “heroes” last year as they worked through the pandemic un-jabbed are being told now they take the jab or they don’t have a job. Medicare reimbursement you see. The employees are all jabbed or medicare may not reimburse those hospitals. No doubt the FDA approval will now speed that up.
Isolation, not a new idea
They are trying to divide us, they are trying to make us feel isolated. Medical apartheid….
Nothing new under the sun, right? The un-jabbed are going to be denied social opportunities and isolated. And in a stunning betrayal of their Hippocratic oath, 75 Florida doctors walked off the job in the middle of their shift rather than treat an un-jabbed patient. Meth head? No probs. Alcoholic? No probs. Wife beater shot by cops? No worries. Weigh 400 lbs and have an extensive medical history? No problem. But un-jabbed. Well! But honestly, look at the picture of the “doctor”. More Than 75 Doctors Walk Out of South Florida Hospital Rather Than Treat the Unvaccinated. What is striking me as odd is the blond chick they are interviewing. Her scrub top is embroidered “Doctor”. That’s it. In all my years I’ve never seen that. I’ve see it Doctor Welby, Doctor Kildare, Doctor Whoosename, but just doctor? No. Is she labeled so she won’t forget what she is or what? That’s just weird.
But, there is hope. The only way they were able to get the Emergency Use License for the experimental jab was to deny there was any effective treatment. There is. Ivermectin or Hydroxychloraquin, zinc, vitamins, azythromyacin etc.
The Indian Bar Association (IBA) sued WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan on May 25, accusing her in a 71-point brief of causing the deaths of Indian citizens by misleading them about Ivermectin.
Point 56 states, “That your misleading tweet on May 10, 2021, against the use of Ivermectin had the effect of the State of Tamil Nadu withdrawing Ivermectin from the protocol on May 11, 2021, just a day after the Tamil Nadu government had indicated the same for the treatment of COVID-19 patients.”
….
Advocate Dipali Ojha, lead attorney for the Indian Bar Association, threatened criminal prosecution against Dr. Swaminathan “for each death” caused by her acts of commission and omission. The brief accused Swaminathan of misconduct by using herposition as a health authority to further the agenda of special interests to maintain an EUA for the lucrative vaccine industry.
….
Dr. Swaminathan was called out for her malfeasance in discrediting Ivermectin to preserve the EUA for the vaccine and pharmaceutical industry. Point 52 reads, “It seems you have deliberately opted for deaths of people to achieve your ulterior goals, and this is sufficient grounds for criminal prosecution against you.”
….
“The Indian Bar Association has warned action under section 302 etc. of the Indian Penal Code against Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and others, for murder of each person dying due to obstruction in treatment of COVID-19 patient effectively by Ivermectin. Punishment under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is death penalty or life imprisonment.”
I am so anxious for the day that Tony Fauxci and every doctor or medical professional that told a Covid patient “that stuff doesn’t work” when the patient requested Ivermectin or Hydroxychloraquin will be called to account for their actions.
The lunacy in Australia has taken on epic proportions.
Oh, I guess that’s how. I wonder if Australia can do a recall election.
And you have to wonder how many of these world governments are following Jacques Attali’s play book.
Jacque Attali
But Australians are fighting back against tyranny, Indians are fighting back against the medical lies, and we as Americans will have our fight too. But we are Americans, we don’t embrace tyranny, and we serve a powerful king who is on our side. The king of the world. This is the month of Elul, when the king is in the field, he meets us where we are, and so a very propitious time to talk to him. About anything. As a friend of mine reminded me, stay focused on G-d.
We do not live in fear, fear is what they used to control us. We live by G-d’s laws, and we can put our faith in him. Tehillim – Psalms – Chapter 91
When I was a kid, the idea of recycling became popular. Mind you our elders had been doing recycling for years. Taking parts from one piece of equipment and using it on another, re-purposing things for jobs that they were never intended, but they made it work. I’m blessed, I had grandparents and parents that were really good at it. They didn’t lecture, they just did it and we learned. In the 70s it became trendy though. Now I’m not in favor of littering or anything else like that, I think recycling is great. My point is that we were doing it long before the government saved us by making it trendy or mandatory.
Some things are great for recycling, soda bottles, hand me down clothes, car parts, old wheelbarrows for flower gardens or strawberries. The limit is creativity. Some things however stunk the first time around, and yet are being recycled. Politicians for example.
Claire McCaskill- Air-Claire ran as a moderate for the Senate from Missouri. Complete with June Cleaver pearl necklace and sweater set she convinced ill informed Missourians she was a moderate. She and the hoplophobic Robin Carnahan tried to hold a rally at a gun shop to convince people they weren’t anti gun. Had people read Missouri Weapons and Self-Defense Law by Kevin Jamison, they would have known when a prosecutor lies openly and says any 12 year old can walk into a gun shop and buy and Uzi she is not honest, and not on your side. Happily some Second Amendment people tipped off the gun shop, who should have known better, and the even was canceled.
Even back then the MSM aka #FakeNews was so biased she was never challenged on it. Well, Air-Claire (all sorts of good articles to choose from there) wants to be relevant again. But to be relevant in today’s Democrat-Socialist party, you have to be for tyranny and against the American people. Claire wants to prove she can fit right in.
If you needed a reminder why the citizens of Missouri refused to re-elect the incompetent, intellectually limited Clair McCaskill, she provided it today. Here’s the headline from the NY Post:…
I had to double-check that this was not a new piece of satire from the Babylon Bee. Nope. I looked at my calendar fearing it was April 1st and this was a lame attempt at macabre humor. Double no.
Here’s what she said:“Joe I have one word: Benghazi. Benghazi had in the House alone six investigations,” the Missouri Democrat told MSNBC host Joe Scarborough. “If you compare and contrast, I don’t want to minimize the loss of life in Benghazi or the problems around the security of those locations, but lets compare and contrast those two events and which is more foundation shaking to our democracy.”
Nope, it’s not the Babylon Bee, The Onion or any other satire blog. It’s not even me being snarky.
Most families have their own holiday traditions on 4th of July. Normally, they involve fireworks, cookouts, swimming pools, and maybe watching a movie like Independence Day, The Patriot, or Jaws.
But the McCaskill family is apparently about to start a new and disturbing tradition.
Just listen to the former senator tell MSNBC what her family has planned for this Independence Day:
“We’re going to start a new family tradition in my family; on the Fourth of July and every Fourth of July going forward, we’re going to watch that New York Times put together of January 6th.”
So, Air-Claire finds watching a bunch of antifa dress up like normal Americans create havoc and then change back into their antifa black cool? Meanwhile normal Americans are just walking around in the Capitol or in the Capitol but destroying or burning nothing and then have their lives ruined something enjoyable? Apparently that’s the mindset needed to be in the “in crowd” in the Democrat-Socialist party today.
Even a small group of Republicans trying to find out what is happening to these prisoners was disrupted by leftist operatives. No free speech for sure.
“I’m going to try and download every movie ever made, and you’re going to try to sign up for Obamacare, and we’ll see which happens first” – Jon Stewart challenging Kathleen Sebelius (former Secretary of Health and Human Services) to a race.
So having proven how adept she is at forcing Americans into something they don’t want, she longs to stretch her little tyrant wings again.
….I think that it’s time to say to those folks, it’s fine. If you don’t choose to get vaccinated, you may not come to work. You may not have access to a situation where you’re going to put my grandchildren in jeopardy where you might kill them or you might put them in a situation where they’re going to carry the virus to someone in a high risk position.
That’s, I think, the point where we are is freedom is one thing, but freedom when you harm others like secondhand smoke and issues that we’ve dealt with very clearly in the past, you can’t drive drunk. You can drink but you can’t drive drunk because you can injure other people. You can’t smoke inside of a public place where you can give cancer to someone else in spite of their never having been a smoker.
So I think we’re reaching that point in the United States for those of us who are vaccinated. I want to take off my mask. I want to be able to live my life with vaccination. And I’m being impinged on by people who say, I don’t want to get vaccinated. It’s fine, but I want them to maybe have a limitation on where they can go and who they can possibly infect.
But Kathleen! You favor abortion, what happened to “My body, my choice”?? Typical Democrat-Socialist hypocrisy.
Recycle fail.
Critical Race Theory-While it’s new to American school children who’s horrified parents are finding out the reason Johnny can’t do math and Janie can’t read is because rather than useful skills that will equip them to live lives as productive American citizens they are instead being taught your skin color determines everything and you should hate people of different colors. The reason of course is different depending on your skin color. Racist much? I’m happy to see parents of all colors and ethnic backgrounds are standing up to the race-baiting tyrants on school boards trying to shove this down the throats of children along with the gender identity agenda. But if you want to see the endgame of CRT, look to South Africa. I’ve written about the on-going genocide in South Africa before. It’s not better, it’s worse, made worse by the Wuhan Flu lockdowns that only kept the flu around longer. Now they face looting in which the police take part, think New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina, and racial attacks on the white farmers. Farm land has been taken away from the white farmers and given to people who know nothing about farming, and aren’t farming it. So rather than having enough food to export, they don’t even have enough for themselves and there is no reason to think it will get better.
Opposition leaders questioned the government response, which had called up 70.000 soldiers to enforce COVID lockdowns, but only 2.500 largely ineffective troops to fight the largest insurrection in South Africa since the end of Apartheid 1994. Videos showed police letting looters escape or participating in looting themselves.
The African National Congress is urging towards a politically motivated disarmament programme. Tightening up on Gun Control Legislation, law-abiding citizens are fearing their inability to protect themselves against the alarming crime rates in South Africa. Rape is a reality. Killing has become a causality. And our means of self-protection is slowly but surely, becoming prohibited…
Socialism>Communism- Socialism which becomes Communism because people figure out living under socialism sucks regardless of what AOC, her college professor, anyone’s college professor, the MSM aka #FakeNews any gullible soul still trusting the #FakeNews says, it sucks. Eventually after it’s too late, people find out. When they try to rebel they catch a baseball bat upside the head. Or are just shot. Cubans were disarmed after the communists came to power.
These freedoms were lost for one reason and one reason only: A DISARMED POPULACE ISN’T FREE. THEY ARE SLAVES TO THE STATE.
And if anyone had any doubts about BLM and what they really are, that time should be over. BLM came out in support of the Cuban dictator killing their citizens.
Black Lives Matter (BLM) issued a statement condemning the US federal government, not Cuba’s communist regime, over its “inhumane treatment” of the Cuban people. Pro-freedom demonstrations have been ongoing on the island nation since Sunday.
The official Black Lives Matter account has posted a statement reaffirming its support of Cuba’s communist regime just as mass anti-government protests are breaking out in the island. BLM also again expressed gratitude for Cuba giving asylum to convicted murderer Assata Shakur
Well, of course they do! They told people they were trained Marxists.
BLM urged the Biden administration to lift the economic sanctions against the tiny island nation of 11 million residents, claiming that these trade concerns were causing unrest.
“Since 1962,” they write, “the United States has forced pain and suffering on the people of Cuba by cutting off food, medicine and supplies, costing… [them] an estimated $130 billion.”
These people are not the brightest crayons in the box, or they think everyone is as gullible as AOC. We aren’t.
Countries where socialism/communism are in place are not known for their healthy vibrant happy middle class. Because there isn’t one. And now they want to try those failed ideas in America by enacting a communist coup.
They are known for their abuse and unjust confinement of citizens who are then tortured. Just like the people who have been locked up since January 6th. Heavily armed men showed up at their homes, families were forced outside at gunpoint in night clothes in 45 degree weather for hours. People that were only walking around the capitol, or in the capitol. None of them have been accused of anything of the magnitude of BLM or antifa. They are being kept in solitary confinement, beaten (so far I hear one has lost an eye) tortured, one hour of turn out a day, no bail, and trials not until next year. Does anyone think President Trump would have allowed any American citizen, regardless of their political affiliation to be treated like this? I don’t. Yet the MSM aka #FakeNews and the rabid left, but I repeat myself, babbled on and on about how President Trump was a fascist. Idiots. There is a Telegram group where Professor David Clements highlights one a day. Most have lost their jobs and businesses as well leaving their families in an awful state.
I’ve heard of the pattern before, in the past. It sounds a bit families to me anyway.
Recycle fail.
Anti-Semitism. I’m not exactly sure why someone thought that sending me a link to a rabidly anti-Semitic website was a good idea. I’m kind of offended, it doesn’t even have any new or creative anti-Semitic lies, just the same old tired ones. Der Sturmer recycles. Actually I think some of them may have come from Der Sturmer. I saw copies of it when I was at Yad Vashem. I’m not giving you the link. Nope, no traffic from me. But you would think that an inquiring mind might be a bit curious about someone who is purporting that we sacrifice children and drink their blood. Yes, we eat meat (ok, I don’t but that has nothing to do with this) but do Jews eat a rare steak?
Would it be kosher to eat a steak that is cooked medium-rare? I ask because it seems that there is still blood that comes out of the meat when cooked like this. Should steak be “well done”?
Answer:
The laws of kashrut require the extraction and drainage of all blood from beef or fowl within 72 hours of slaughtering. This is accomplished through a unique soaking and salting process—or, in some instances, through broiling.
The reddish liquid that remains inside the meat after this procedure is not halachically considered blood; it is the meat’s “juice,” and is 100% kosher.
Today, kosher meat is sold with the blood already removed. Therefore, if dining in a kosher restaurant, or if you bought your meat at a reliable kosher butcher, you can confidently eat your medium-rare steak.
So if we don’t even eat a rare steak because of the blood, why on earth would you think we are killing and draining a young woman for a sacrifice?
Then there is the tired old blood of non-Jewish children in Matzah. Guess what?! For reasons we won’t go into, I still have my box that my Pesach Matzah came in! It is Kosher and from Israel. Double threat what hey! So good news, let’s take a look shall we?
Actual box of Kosher for Pesach Matzah! From actual Israel!Ingredients in box of Kosher for Pesach matzah 2021
Blood? Nope, no blood. And it’s Kosher and everything!
Of course there is the obligatory Jews going to rule the world tripe. But honestly, my favorite answer to this is one my fellow writer Y.B. gave a few years ago.
But it would take wayyyy too long to run a check on the a$$bat that wrote the web site. It took about 5 seconds to find out the guy is such a raving moonbat that even though he completed law school he was denied a license to practice law because he was so flipping unhinged. Yeah, boy howdy that’s who I’m going to take as a solid source about my faith. What a load of cow shiff. But I guess if you tend to believe like the AOC, Tliar, and Omar crowd, your beliefs fit right in with theirs. So, I guess I would wonder if they have typically found their opinions to agree with them? Have they honestly found them to be truthful? Or do you just hate Jews.
This is not a new pattern, Julius Streicher used it to great effect, and now today’s Democrat-Socialists are using it. Shutting down the free speech (of one side), government spying (of one side) unjust imprisonment (of one side) abuse and torture while in captivity (of one side). The Der Sturmer media is reprising it’s role as well with it’s constant vilification of conservatives, and covering up for Xiden on the other hand. Initially the German people wanted nothing to do with hitler’s anti-Semitic lunacy, but the constant dripping of it from their free government volks radios, and the Shiff that was published in Der Sturmer and the people began to change. The disarmament of the populace (of one side)
A repeat of a pattern that never needs to be repeated. But, I take comfort in knowing Streicher was hanged. He facilitated the loss of many Jewish, lives with his lies. Many from other ethnic groups were killed as well, but Streicher didn’t target them.
The Ten Stages of Genocide
Recycle fail.
But what I wish we could recycle? The brilliance of Jackie Mason, The Ultimate Jew. Brad Alpert Z”L, may his memory be for a blessing, urged me to listen to some Jackie Mason YouTubes. Fabulous! We lost Jackie Mason Z”L this weekend. A huge loss. So I will leave you with this Jackie Mason clip on gun control. Warning, there are some naughty words in it…..just FYI.
Recycle score? Another Jackie Mason would be a winner!
Oops. Not so much. In the latest filing, we learn that…
In the original detention memoranda, the undersigned stated that law enforcement found a “fully constructed U.S. Capitol Lego set.” Please note that after a review of the photographs from the search, there appears to have been a miscommunication and that statement appears to be inaccurate. The Lego set was in a box and not fully constructed at the time of the search, as pictured below.
At this rate, I “fully” expect Morss’ confiscated handgun, rifle, and shotgun to be broken airsoft toys. They should finally get around to “reviewing” those pictures, too. In fact, one might — unrealistically, I suppose — expect a US Attorney to look at the evidence before filing charges.
But welcome to modern Amerika.
That filing is an explanation of why the man should be held in pretrial detention without bond. Basically, the feds are saying, We are incapable of differentiating between a box of plastic blocks and an assembled, scaled tactical planning model. Therefore, Morss is even more dangerous than we thought.
I also missed another stupid point out of so many in the July 2 filing. one of the dangerous items they found in Morss’ possession was… a tourniquet. Even worse, “a black tourniquet.” Yes, apparently possession of a tourniquet is proof of deadly intent (along with the scissors). Clearly the man planned to viciously save someone’s life at need.
DOJ, take note: I admit to being in possession of of shooting trauma kit. It not only includes an Evil Black Tourniquet, but also incriminating scissors, dressings, bandages, and .. most nefariously — gloves to avoid leaving fingerprint evidence of my lifesaving skills.
While I don’t have any Lego blocks, I’m fairly sure I’ve got a picture of the Capitol somewhere on my hard drive.
You know where to find me.
Jews. Guns. No compromise. No surrender.
Password Reset
Please enter your e-mail address. You will receive a new password via e-mail.
