Tag Archives: bias

Quinnipiac: 60%… Dishonest

This anti-rights screed by Senators Murphy and Feinstein offers so much commentary fodder. But I’m going to hit one point here.

Act to Break the Cycle of Gun Deaths
Outlawing these weapons, an action supported by 60 percent of Americans…

They seem to be referencing a recent Quinnipiac poll. We’re going to take a closer look.

48. Do you support or oppose stricter gun laws in the United States?
Support 61%
Oppose 34%
DK/NA 5%

As usual, I’ll say that means little, because the general population (from personal observations and conversations) knows little about existing laws. That’s why we see legislators entering bills to make domestic violence offenders prohibited persons, and to make it illegal to manufacture and undetectable guns… even though both have been the law for decades.

But accepting those numbers for the moment, drill down to the specifics.

49. Do you support or oppose requiring background checks for all gun buyers?
Support 94%
Oppose 4%
DK/NA 2%

More than a third of the population opposes stricter “gun laws” but want universal background checks?

50. Do you support or oppose requiring individuals to obtain a license before being able to purchase a gun?
Support 77%
Oppose 19%
DK/NA 4%

More than a third of the population opposes stricter “gun laws” but want licensing?

51. Do you support or oppose a nationwide ban on the sale of assault weapons?
Support 63%
Oppose 33%
DK/NA 4%

Ah ha! numbers that roughly match at last. But even less meaningful than question 48. What’s an “assault weapon”? No two jurisdictions that have such a thing define it the same way. How many people who “support” a ban think they’re talking about AK-47s and M-16s? How many realize common AWB proposals would ban their hunting rifle?

Setting aside the silly contradictions of alleged responses to those questions, let’s see how they went about asking folks. And where.

Here is Quinnipiac’s methodolgy:

The overall adult sample is weighted to recent Census data using a sample balancing procedure to match the demographic makeup of the population by region, gender, age, education and race.

Weighted by region. That isn’t necessarily a bad thing, done correctly. But… region? Not state? What are the “regions”?

https://poll.qu.edu/regional-definitions/

Regional Definitions

California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York City, New York State, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, Wisconsin.

15 “regions,” representing just 14 states. New York City gets equal billing. All the selection is biased towards Democrat holdings, don’t you think?

Considering the population densities, they’ve selected regions guaranteed to provide a Democrat bias’ A huge swathe of the country doesn’t get polled at all.

Ever.

The methodology told what states they used for this poll, but I got curious as to how extensive the problem might be. Searching their site for other states, I found their search tool.

16 states total. That’s it. Biased toward Dem and swing states. Searching for Georgia polls (all) for “gun control” yields…

Zilch. They don’t survey Georgia on the topic. Georgia, where roughly 1 in eight adults has a concealed carry license, and there’s at least a shotgun in damned near every home.

If any other state is there, I can’t find it.

I now understand why Quinnipiac polls have always been so far twisted to the Left.

While a more blatant way of biasing a poll, it’s far from the only technique. Several pollsters tried to get the youngest — and more likely to be liberal and ill-informed — potential voters.

“For the landline sample, interviewers requested to speak with the youngest male member of the household who is at least 18 years of age; if there was no male in the household, interviewers requested the youngest female.”

If you want to survey people to see what new laws they want, do it this way.

Quinnipiac’s — and those other offenders’ — technique are best suited to obscuring the truth, not finding it.

[Permission to republish this article is granted so long as it is not edited and the author and The Zelman Partisans are credited.]

 

Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP and web host bills. And the rabbits need feed. Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail

Political Polling

Did you ever wonder how pollsters can keep coming up with claims that 90+% of Americans want universal background checks preemptively-prove-your-innocence prior restraint on rights when every time it goes to the voters actual results never come within 30 points of the claim?

Poll: Vermonters strongly support new gun-control measures
More than two of every three Vermonters say they support the new gun-control measures signed into law by Gov. Phil Scott this year, according to the results of a poll conducted by Vermont Public Radio and Vermont PBS.

Vermont is pretty liberal, so maybe that shouldn’t be a surprise. But it’s a bit of a strange state when it comes to RKBA. When I lived in New England, I often heard how much Vermonters like their guns; libertarian types would note it with approval, liberals with befuddlement, and conservatives made jokes about “heavily armed hippies.” But everyone knew it.

So how did VPR/VPBS come up with results indicating such heavy approval of gun control? The secret is in the polling methodology, something I like to look at nearly as much as alleged results. In this case, the clue is:

“For the landline sample, interviewers requested to speak with the youngest male member of the household who is at least 18 years of age; if there was no male in the household, interviewers requested the youngest female.”

They actively screened for the youngest voting-eligible demographic. The group which most strongly leans liberal, statistically speaking. That accounts for the liberal skew in the results.

I mentioned this to someone, as an example of the worst built-in survey bias methodology I’d ever seen. And that person told me something of which I was unaware: that most phone poll calls she’s gotten do the same thing. It’s been years since I participated in a phone poll,* so I hadn’t realized this. It’s the first time I spotted that selection criteria in methodology notes (usually I see a pro-urban selection bias, and over-representation of Democrats compared to the general population).

Those young adults also tends to have the lowest voter turnout, which accounts for the fact that polls rarely match voting reality.

That age selection game is particularly problematic for Vermont.

“Vermont faces a demographic challenge. Our population is stagnant and getting older. We have fewer school-age kids, which drives up the per-pupil cost. We have fewer young adults to invigorate the workforce and pay forward the costs of retirement and health care for older Vermonters.”
The Mass Exodux Myth

But VPR and VPBS think that comparatively tiny group speaks for the older folks — gun-toting hippies — who greatly outnumber them.

So when you hear that “95% of Americans want to a$$-rape the Constitution,” remember that it really means “95% of millenials who probably aren’t going to vote, and think the Army carries semi-auto AR-15s, believe bump-fire stocks are machineguns, and expect blackmarket arms dealers to conduct universal background checks, want to bend you over the table and have their way with you. Without vaseline.”


* That’s because I don’t answer calls with blocked caller ID, or unrecognized numbers. If Pew, Gallup, or whoever wants to poll me, their caller ID should say Pew, Gallup, or whoever. And the last few poll calls I did take (years ago) turned out to be push polls, and I hung up on them.


Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could use the money, what with truck repairs and recurring bills.

paypal_btn_donateCC_LG


Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail