All posts by Guest Post

Keep it Safe and Legal: Traveling Across States With Your Gun

Guest post by Richard Douglas


There are plenty of reasons why you may need to take your firearm across state lines. Maybe your friend has a hunting cabin “up North”, or you are taking part in a competition just over the state border, or maybe you finally booked that dream hunt in the Rockies. Whatever the reason, don’t pack that rifle and scope just yet! Make sure you are traveling safe and legal.

Basic Safety

This almost goes without saying, but regardless of which states you may be traveling through you need to transport your gun safely. Always keep it locked up, unloaded, and out of reach. Keep any and all licences and permits on you when carrying.

State/Local Laws

State laws can be the most confusing because they can all be different and are changing continually. Make sure you look up the most recent laws for every state you will cross, even if you just went on that same trip last year. Many states along the Eastern seaboard have very restrictive gun laws.

Some cities also require special permits. For example, you will need a specific New York City permit for your handgun; just having a New York state licence is not sufficient. Any time your gun is readily accessible within reach (on your hip, glovebox, or under a seat) state and local laws apply.

Federal Law

Assuming you are legally allowed to own a gun, the Senate Bill 2414, aka the McClure-Volkmer Act, lets you travel with your firearm across more restrictive states but ONLY IF you comply with specific rules:

  1. You have a license to carry firearms in your home state for any lawful purpose (like self-defense).

  2. You can lawfully possess firearms in your destination.

  3. The car doesn’t have a loaded firearm. It must be out of your reach along with the ammunition.

This allows you to travel through a state with restrictive laws, but don’t dawdle. If you stay longer than necessary, stop to visit sites, visit with family, or take a wayward route, this could be construed as a destination. In this case, it could be argued in court that the federal law does not apply. Try not to spend more than 24 hours in any state you need to travel through due to local or state laws.

Note that this law applies to firearms and ammunition, but does NOT apply to larger capacity magazines, “assault weapons,” or other firearm accessories prohibited in a particular state. Make sure all your accessories are legal for any states you will be traveling through.

Just remember: as soon as that gun is loaded or within reach, state/local laws apply regardless!

Flying Commercial

If you want to fly commercially with your firearm, gun parts, ammunition, or other shooting accessories, there are strict TSA rules to follow:

  1. It must be declared verbally or in writing

  2. Unloaded

  3. Locked in a hard-sided container

  4. Checked as luggage, or stored inside your checked luggage

  5. Ammo must be locked separately and also checked

  6. The passenger must have the key/combo

Remember that all checked luggage is subject to inspection. If this occurs you may be required to unlock the container for further inspection. Make sure to look up ammunition quantity and packaging requirements for your particular airline as they can differ. Also be aware of the local/state laws where you have a connecting flight or layover as you will need to abide by local laws there as well.

Special Considerations

There are certain exceptions you will want to keep in mind when planning your route:

  1. Native American Reservations: Each nation/tribe has varying regulations regarding firearms. While most of them follow state guidelines for non-tribal members, be sure to look up and abide by any and all laws applicable.

  2. Federal Facilities: Currently firearms are banned from all federal facilities. These include but are not limited to post offices, park ranger stations,

  3. National Parks and Wildlife Refuges: While you may possess a firearm in most of these areas (in accordance with that state’s particular law), it can be a little tricky. There may be federal facilities (ranger stations, visitor’s centers, etc.) within the park/refuge where guns are not allowed. The rules can vary by park, especially if it is located across multiple states. The parks may also post signage indicating other locations where you may not have firearms. Make sure you research the regulations for any parks you will be traveling through.

  4. International travel: Few countries are as gun-friendly as the United States. Be sure to understand and follow each country’s laws and restrictions when visiting places outside the US.

With all the complexity and complications of traveling with firearms, the next time you are headed to your sandy beach vacation you might want to leave the gun at home.

Guest Author Bio:

Richard Douglas is a long-time shooter, outdoor enthusiast and technologist. He is the founder and editor of Scopes Field, and a columnist at The National Interest, Cheaper Than Dirt, Daily Caller and other publications.

Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail

The ATF Withdraws Its Wildly Unconstitutional Pistol Guidance

Guest post by Richard Douglas


If you’re into firearms, then you probably know about the ATF’s brute force bureaucracy and gun legislation (even though they’re not a legislative agency). They have a well-recorded history of coming down hard on firearms and those that own them, frequently in the news for botched raids, civilian injury, and red flag laws.

The ATF’s newest jab at the constitution is an attempt to strengthen restrictions on rifle caliber pistols and inconspicuously creating a national gun registry.

If you’re not up to speed on our current gun laws. You can own a rifle-caliber pistol without tax stamps or special fees, but there are already strict guidelines of what makes it a rifle-caliber pistol and not an SBR(short-barreled rifle). The barrel length can be as short as you want it to, but you’re not allowed to attach buttstock to your weapon. Instead, you must forego a stock completely, or attach what is called a pistol brace or stabilizing brace. These braces are designed to assist disabled people when handling and shooting firearms; they allow a person to shoot rifle-caliber weapons with only one hand.

Since braces are not technically buttstocks, people began using these braces as a substitute to subvert the ATF’s asinine rules.

They subsequently ruled that shouldering these arm braces was now illegal since that single movement turned a rifle-caliber pistol into an SBR, a felony if you did not fork out money for a tax stamp.

After some understandable outcry, the ATF changed the rule on a whim, again, ruling that it is no longer a crime to shoulder a pistol brace. Although the ATF was and is still hated with a passion, these terms were acceptable for the time being, until late 2020 anyway.

In complete disregard for the historical events taking place in our country, with many afraid for their lives and their family’s lives, the ATF again decided it was again time to crack down on legal gun owners in the midst of a global pandemic and domestic civil unrest.

This time though, they started out by sending cease and desist letters to brace manufacturers, namely Q, the proprietors of the famous Honey Badger, ordering them to immediately halt production of pistol brace and weapons with pistol brace attachments.

At this time they also began going after other firearm parts shops that sold certain parts that could be made into a suppressor.

Now the most important part is in the way the ATF presented their guidance.

It’s vague, wildly imprecise, and almost entirely subjective. Guidelines included unclear language like stating that if a rifle has a pistol brace, it needs to have optics at certain angles to assist in one-armed shooting angles, it can’t be “too heavy” to lift with one hand, front grips aren’t allowed because that means you’re using both hands. Finally, they end with a suggestion to gun owners who are predictably confused by all these strange and stringent rules, actually turning your firearm over to the ATF so they can decide for you.

This seemingly suggests that the ATF doesn’t actually have any solid rules, just things that they can decide make your pistol a felony on a whim. Not to mention the 52% of ATF agents that are overweight and out of shape are the ones testing these firearms with presumably weak physiques.

Following public outcry and vilification, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms quietly withdrew this pistol guidance, which may seem like good news (and it is for the moment), but they have made their intentions clear.

It’s quite possible that they’re “testing the waters” before they attempt more restrictive and unconstitutional gun control efforts.

They have set a precedent that they will continue to build on in the future unless someone reigns them in.

Guest Author Bio:

Richard Douglas is a long-time shooter, outdoor enthusiast and technologist. He is the founder and editor of Scopes Field, and a columnist at The National Interest, Cheaper Than Dirt, Daily Caller and other publications.

Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail

Quislings

[Some readers may think that this column is just about immigration, and is inappropriate for a site dedicated to Second Amendment issues. Please consider the potential effects of importing large numbers of people with little to no knowledge — much less respect for — constitutionally protected rights. – Editor]


Guest column by Historian


Quisling. A curious and somewhat whimsical sounding word. What does it mean? I’ve asked, and surprisingly few of my acquaintances knew the origin or meaning of the word; most of the responses were more or less humorous.. One acquaintance of mine said that it was a short quiz. Another made a humorous reference to the result of an amorous encounter between Mama Quis and Papa Quis. The word seems to have largely dropped out of our discourse, and is not often heard to-day. Some might argue that this is right, that old words, regardless of how cute they are that are no longer applicable to the world we live in today, should be retired. But the origin and meaning of the word “quisling” is neither cute nor innocent, nor is it at all funny. And it is as relevant today as it was when it was coined.

On April 9th, 1940, just over 79 years ago, military units of Nazi Germany invaded neutral Norway, supported by the fascist politician and head of the Norwegian Nazi Party, (Nasjonal Samling,) Vidkun Quisling, who then promptly staged a coup against the fleeing legitimate Norwegian government. Beginning at least as early as 1939, Quisling had urged Nazi Germany to invade neutral Norway, making trips to Germany to urge Hitler to invade Norway, and conspiring with German Intelligence agencies, providing information about Norwegian military plans and defences to the German military.

In 1942, Quisling became the Nazi-appointed Minister-President, under Reichskomissar Josef Terboven, and later that year, the Norwegian Endlosung commenced. While the numbers are a miniscule fraction of those murdered in Germany and Eastern Europe, about 1/3 of Norway’s Jews were sent to German extermination camps, mainly Auschwitz, under Quisling. Quisling supported the invasion of his country, overthrew his lawful government, and administered the displacement and murder of his countrymen, for political advantage.

It is worth noting that anti-semitism had, and still has, deep roots in Norway; Jews were forbidden to settle there until 1851, and only about 2100 Jews lived there before the Nazi invasion. Over 700 were murdered during the war; the rest fled the country, mostly to Sweden or England. Today there are two synagogues in Norway and about 700 Jews, both of which are subjected to attacks. In contrast, today there are about 160,000 Muslims there, over 3% of the population, let in by modern-day quislings.

So what is a ‘quisling’? A quisling is a traitor who collaborates with and supports a foreign invasion of his country; the term was coined shortly after the Nazi invasion by the Times of London, which referred to Norwegian collaborators as quislings. This term was commonly used during the Second World War, and is still occasionally used today- Paul Krugman recently referred to Donald Trump as a quisling for his supposed (and now shown to be non-existent) support of Russia.

Which begs the question- who are the REAL present day quislings among us here in these presently united States?

Who are those who have conspired to block the administration of US law, allowing millions of illegal aliens to criminally invade the US, and to remain here, committing further crimes?

Who are those who have funded and encouraged the above mentioned invasion of these presently united States?

Who are those who have treasonously refused to fund the defence of the borders of these presently united States?

Who are those who have, just as Vidkun Quisling did, uttered slanderous anti-Semitic diatribes against their supposed countrymen?

Who are those who have, just as Vidkun Quisling did, attempted a coup against their lawful government?

Who are those who have, for political advantage, subverted law and justice, aided and abetted murder, suborned non-enforcement of the laws, and supported invasion by large numbers of criminals and fanatics whose views and moral code is entirely opposed to the entire basis of Western Civilization?

What do you call such people?

Quislings, one and all. Traitorous anti-American collaborators with murderous fanatics, AND THEY MUST BE CALLED SUCH.

Nancy Pelosi? Quisling.
George Soros? Quisling.
Ocasio-Cortez? Quisling.
Omar-Ilhan? Quisling.
Comey/Rosenstein/Strozk? Quislings, one and all.
Anyone, of any political party, who is complicit in the ongoing attempt to subvert and overthrow the Republic by means of an invasion by illegal immigrants, is a Quisling.

Vidkun Quisling allied himself with those he thought would win the Second World War in the 1930s. He was rewarded by his Nazi masters, and ruled Norway during the German occupation. In 1945, Quisling was arrested, tried and convicted of murder and treason after the collapse of Nazi Germany, and shot in Oslo Norway in October 1945. Sic Semper Tyrannis.
Our modern day quislings would do well to remember his fate, although they certainly will not. So much the worse for them. “ Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it.”

Will you remember the word?

Will you apply it where appropriate?

Quisling.

Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail