Last week we asked which of the top-level Republican candidates would be most dangerous to gun rights. This week the question is: Which Democrat candidate is worst for gun rights?
—–
Last week’s poll is now closed.
Poll: Dangerous Democrats
2 thoughts on “Poll: Dangerous Democrats”
Comments are closed.
‘All of the Above’ would have been a nice option, but HRC: If you’ve read Aaron and El Neil’s Hope (and if you haven’t, you should), they nailed it:
After a while, they all had come to understand clearly that the woman was planning to make up for every bit of humiliation she’d suffered, no matter who had to pay the price.”
[…]
“Twenty Secret Service agents altogether, the former First Lady thought. That hardly seemed adequate in the middle of a country full of guns — 750 million of them at the BATF’s last shamefaced estimate — and 100 million rednecks and genetic culls who stupidly hated her for trying to help them.
Take away those guns and they’d learn to love her. They wouldn’t have any choice.
HRC is the worst, partly because she’s the most likely to get the nomination, but also because her policies are slightly worse than O’Malley’s (I don’t believe O’Malley has the stomach for confiscatory bans, including SWAT teams raiding private residences; Hillary does, I have no doubt). Sanders is somewhat less anti-gun than the other two (not more pro-gun, just less anti-gun), but not by much. If push came to shove, I believe he’d ban them all in a heartbeat, too.
No good freedom-loving options from the Dems, and no “all of the above” option in the poll.