Passed to the governor for signature a day ahead of the announced schedule, depending largely on his political ambitions, not merit or lack, for passage. Next probable and equally “logical” step: Unregulated firearm ownership for every man, woman and child in America.
The weirdly disjointed sentence structure, and the peculiar “logical” leap from “one state passed Constitutional Carry” to “totally unregulated firearm ownership for absolutely everyone in America” was an instant warning that I was reading the ravings of a not-entirely sane person. I scrolled down to see who this Paul Shriver is.
Paul Shriver, EdD, is a forensic and clinical psychologist.
Sad to say, but in my experience (and others*) psychologists have a strong tendency to be b–f— nuts. As you’ll see, this appears to be the case with Shriver. Couple that with a pointless EdD, and we have a perfect storm of irrationality. He doesn’t have both oars in the water. The elevator doesn’t go to the top. Pick a metaphor.
Firearm use is by definition a violent act (homicide when a human is the recipient) and has no place in civilized society.
He seems to be unaware of target practice; which would explain another statement he makes later. He also seems to think that humans invariably, without exception die when shot. Chicago says otherwise.
No reasonable person could possibly imagine that expressing one’s feelings or opinions with a bullet could be equivalent to “free speech” or even exist as a “right” on the same piece of paper.
Projecting much, Shriver? Offhand, I don’t recall ever firing a round to express an opinion.
But let’s get to the meat.
The only real solution must begin with the repeal of the 2nd Amendment in its entirety and without delay. It might then be re-written in clear language as a privilege to be strictly regulated — the details to be worked out later by usual democratic means.
Never mind that the Supreme Court has already found that it is a right, not a privilege; and that it pre-dates the Amendment he finds so bothersome. And he seems to be ignoring Indiana’s own pesky constitution.
Section 32. The people shall have a right to bear arms, for the defense of themselves and the State.
He’ll be needing to convince his neighbors to repeal that one, too. Based on my time living in Indiana, I’d say not damned likely.
In the interim, of course, all guns in current ownership, manufacture, storage, etc., would need to be recalled, and if not “re-legalized,” eliminated. Some current types and uses, would be restored, regulated and licensed as appropriate with little real inconvenience. Thus, this idea is not anti-gun per se, nor in any sense extreme.
Repealing the Second Amendment and confiscating all firearms in the country is anti-gun. And it sounds pretty damned extreme. And about as “anti-gun” as one could get.
Hmm. No exception there for police. Universal disarmament. hat should be interesting.
Meanwhile, I and my personal gun: Locked, no bullets, single action, and not very accurate (and therefore little threat) remain very truly yours for peace, good will, and universal disarmament in our times.
I imagine the “not very accurate” issue lays mainly in his lack of practice, since he wouldn’t want to violently attack a peice of paper. But if all firearm use is violence, why does he have one? Perhaps Paul Shriver should be red flagged, starting his “universal disarmament” with himself.
* I knew a woman with a doctorate in psychology. She once told me she left the field — research psychology — when she realized that most of her peers were nuts. She also told me that clinical psychologists are worse.
Who’s the dumbest one of all? I never expect much sense from victim-disarmers, but the CT Mirror’s Mark Robinson may have set a new low bar.
The 2nd Amendment doesn’t say that
Let’s not buy into misconceptions about the 2nd Amendment when advancing Gov. Lamont’s gun control proposals.
What might those misconceptions be?
Public perception and debate only changed a little more than a generation ago. Until recently, this has been the overwhelming consensus among Americans and in the courts. Ever since the aftermath of the War of 1812 (when veterans returned home from war with their firearms) the federal government has regulated and restricted the right to bear arms, and did so without political controversy.
According to “A Well Regulated Right: The Early American Origins of Gun Control,” by Saul Cornell and Nathan DeDino, during the decades after the Revolutionary War, the sale of firearms was forbidden to Catholics, slaves, indentured servants, and Native Americans.
He went there: Gun control is good because there is no individual right to arms, and we used to disarm Catholics, slave, and Indians.
Holy s[…].
Say… since slavery was legal then, does he want to re-institute that as well?
Moving on.
In U.S. v Miller in 1936, the Supreme Court ruled on a case involving the National Firearms Act, (which was passed after the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre). In that case, the Court ruled unanimously that the 2nd Amendment pertains to militias and not to individual rights.
Aside from the chronological error (MILLER was 1939, which gives you an idea of how well Robinson studied this issue), MILLER was about the status of the defendant’s sawed-off shotgun, not individual RKBA. Specifically, the Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear militarily useful arms, and that no evidence was presented showing that the military used short-barreled shotguns; thus, registration of a non-militarily useful arm could be required. No such evidence was presented because the defendant had died, and with no one to pay their bills, his attorneys didn’t show up to argue the case. (And keep that “militarily useful part in mind.)
But in 2008, in District of Columbia v Heller, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the majority, ruling that the 2nd Amendment did create an individual right to bear arms. That is – literally – the first time the high court took this position.
No. The Court found that the Second Amendment protects a preexisting right.
Nor was this the first time that SCOTUS had found the Second to be an individual right. The Supreme Court has ruled that way since at least 1857 (hint: SCOTUS ruled against Dred Scott because if he was a free man, he would have a right to bear arms just like anyone else). If Robinson had bother reading the HELLER decision, he might have noticed that Scalia cited numerous prior precedents for an individual right.
Robinson has a little list of further infringements that he wants CT Governor Lamont to impose.
Close the loopholes in assault weapons laws
Remember that “militarily useful” part of MILLER? If “assault weapons” are nasty, military-style arms, then MILLER (and HELLER) already found that we have an individual right to them. Shall we go there; in court, I mean?
Make domestic violence convictions an automatic disqualifier for obtaining a gun permit
Well, that seems a little redundant, since a domestic violence conviction already makes possession of a firearm a crime. Doubly redundant since CGS § 29-28(b) also mentions that no permit may be issued to anyone prohibited under 18 USC 922.
With the recent decision in the Gretchen Whitmer faux kidnapping plot, which saw two of the defendants acquitted and another two had a result of a hung jury. Which is amazing considering how little evidence the defense was allowed to present. In some cases because it might “confuse the jury”. Uh huh.
Both before and during the trial, prosecutors went to extraordinary lengths to exclude evidence and witnesses that might undermine their arguments, while winning the right to bring in almost anything favorable to their own side. As a result, defense attorneys were largely reduced to nibbling at the edges of the government’s case in hopes of instilling doubt in the jurors’ minds, and to making claims about official misconduct with vanishingly few pieces of evidence to support them.
But did you know there is actual video of the planning sessions?
Well, yeah, it’s the Bee, but I figure that’s probably about how it really worked. So isn’t it interesting that the head of the Detroit office at the time was transferred to DC shortly before January 6th? Guess he had a perfect work resume, eh wot?
Many have pointed out the striking FBI parallels between the Capitol riot that took place on Jan. 6, 2021, and the Whitmer would-be kidnapping case. Even a New York Times reporter admitted on footage captured by undercover Project Veritas staffers that there were “a ton of FBI informants” among the Jan. 6 rioters.
That is quite a coincidence isn’t it? The events following January 6th have long bothered me. There is so much video footage that hasn’t been released, why not? Ashli Babbit’s murder by a cop who had left his service weapon in a bathroom in the past, now murdered an American citizen who moments before had been yelling at a cop to call for back up and tried to stop a man much bigger than herself from breaking in a door. Oh, and he’s now been promoted. And rather than have a fair hearing or trial the DC swamp just covered it up.
“How many FBI agents or confidential informants actively participated in the events of Jan. 6?” Cruz asked Jill Sanborn, executive assistant director of the FBI’s national security branch.
“Sir, I’m sure you can appreciate that I can’t go into the specifics of sources and methods,” Sanborn said.
Cruz replied, “Did any FBI agents or confidential informants actively participate in the events of Jan. 6, yes or no?”
“Sir, I can’t answer that,” Sanborn said.
“Did any FBI agents or confidential informants commit crimes of violence on Jan. 6?” Cruz asked.
“I can’t answer that, sir,” Sanborn replied.
Well of course you can’t.
The list of normal American citizens the FIB went after is staggering. Here’s a selection of a few.Included are a single Mom who is at risk of losing her infant and spending 30 years in jail. For the crime of…..wait for it….being a proud boy. Yep, those Demoncrats really can’t tell boys from girls. One would think the FIB, being the crack investigative agency that it is could figure out if she just gave birth..oh yeah, I forgot, birthing person. Well, and they probably aren’t biologists either. If we’re lucky Demoncrats will be extinct in time, seeing as how they don’t have the reproducing thing down yet. But these stories are just heartbreaking, a Dad who forgives the piece of crap son that turned him into the FIB because he wouldn’t let the boy take his Mom’s car to a BLM riot. Geez, didn’t tell him he couldn’t go, just he couldn’t take his Mom’s car. I mean these stories are heartbreaking. Especially when you get into how the prisoners have been treated in the DC prison.
Deletes Twitter page? Wow, that sounds really serious, not got fired, denied pension or anything like that, just deletes Twitter page.
These people are being denied edible food, access to see their families, healthcare (thought that was a human right obama?) and basic human rights, let alone dignity. I’m not sure it’s true, but I hear there is a letter asking for Putin to liberate the DC gulag.
As Washington DC is funded by taxpayer dollars, I would think there would be some leverage. And this is what gets to me. Other than some notable names how many politicians are defending people that are in jail for going to a peaceful rally? How many are parroting back how appalled they were by the behavior and on ad nauseam? I thought Americans objected to political prisoners, and they certainly are. But our big speaking politicians are all mush mouthed on this.
Why has no one contacted Amnesty International?
But you know who has stepped up to the plate? Bin Laden. Yep, Bin Laden. Not that one. Noor, his niece. She is amazing, and I’m not just saying that because I’m totally jealous of her hair. On February 7th, this year:
*On February 7, 2022 PACE submitted this document (ref. A/HRC/49/NGO/244, published on March 9, 2022) to the UN Human Rights Council with literally one minute left before the automated system was shut down. Hence why there are a couple of typos in the official document. Also, UN editors systematically changed ‘the U.S.’ or ‘U.S.’ to ‘the United States of America’, annoyingly making the original document less than an ideal read –– please ignore.
Yes, Noor Bin Laden has submitted a document to the UN Human Rights Council on behalf of the January 6th political prisoners. The story behind it, and what she submitted can be found here, on her web site. There is also a link to the official UN document. Here’s a snippet:
An African regime that behaved like the Biden administration, using its state security services to suppress dissent and punish political opponents, under the guise of a “domestic war on terror,” would be swiftly condemned by the UN, and punished with sanctions.
We respectfully urge the OHCHR to reconsider its January 18, 2021 statement, in light of new evidence, and to take forceful action against the grievious human rights violations now being unleashed against political dissidents by US security services.
Yep, Noor Bin Laden doing the job American politicians haven’t done.
Meanwhile the FIB has become a joke, and it needs to be defunded as well as D.C.
Yeah, I wanted to try to find a way to end it on a bit of a smile, if possible. Pesach starts tomorrow evening. We celebrate our G-d taking us out of the slavery of Egypt, towards a life and land where we could live with the directions for living a good life according to the directions G-d would soon be giving us.
May political prisoners all over the world soon taste freedom, and may we all leave the slavery of our own private “Egypts”.
I think it’s high time for manufacturers of unfinished frames to start suing the heck out of Everytown for Gun Safety.
But gun safety advocacy groups, like Everytown for Gun Safety, which pushed the federal government for years to take action on ghost guns, applauded Biden’s moves and insisted that both Dettelbach’s appointment and the finalized rule will help combat gun violence.
“Ghost guns look like a gun, they shoot like a gun, and they kill like a gun, but up until now they haven’t been regulated like a gun,” said John Feinblatt, Everytown’s president. (link)
Feinblatt isn’t stupid. He isn’t ignorant. He isn’t mistaken.
He is a liar.
Privately manufactured firearms are firearms, and are regulated as such. A prohibited person may not build one. A prohibited person may not possess one. They may not be manufactured with the intent to sell, only for personal use. All that before the Biden administration’s new rule.
Certainly the Department of Justice and ATF are aware of that.
Seven men charged with guns trafficking in Inland Empire, ‘ghost guns’ among 30 firearms seized
Seven men have been arrested and charged with multiple federal firearms- and drug-related offenses as part of a federal investigation that recovered seven automatic weapons among a haul of so-called ghost guns, officials said Tuesday.
[…]
Most of the guns were privately made firearms bearing no serial numbers or identifying marks, commonly referred to as “ghost guns.”
[…]
Damon Moore, aka “Damage,” 27, of Bellflower was charged with engaging in the business of dealing in firearms without a license, being a prohibited person in possession of a gun, and distribution of methamphetamine.
If “ghost guns” are, as Everytown Liar-In-Chief claims, unregulated, exactly what US Code were these men charged under, eh? Looks like a truckload of 18 U.S. Code § 922 and 18 U.S. Code § 923 violations, but Feinblatt says it ain’t so; not too swift for an attorney. Maybe the Catholic University of America should demand his law degree back.
And a question for real attorneys: Is it a reportable ethics violation for an attorney to deliberately misrepresent laws?
I’m a bit curious about why the AP’s “Lead Justice Dept. & federal law enforcement reporter” let a demonstrably false statement like that go unchallenged. It raises the question of whether he’s an ignorant idiot, or just a fluffer for the victim-disarmament industry. (Rhetorical, of course; it’s AP.)
I haven’t done a deep dive on legislation lately, so let’s take a look at HR 6225 Federal Firearm Licensee Act, sponsored by Illinois DIMwit Robin Kelly.
First, get past the bill’s name. It is not just Federal Firearms Licensee regulation. So what is it? Everything. The kitchen sink might even be in there.
Section “(36) The term ‘facilitator’ means any person engaged in the business of hosting a commercial marketplace in which offers for firearm sales, purchases, or other transfers are allowed to be made,
This is new. Landlords would have to have a federal license to lease to FFLs. A thousand bucks. Per year.
We can’t have those nasty “ghost guns” out there.
Sec. 3 “(40) (A) The term ‘frame or receiver’—
“(i) means a part of a weapon that provides or is intended to provide the housing or structure to hold or integrate 1 or more fire control components, even if pins or other attachments are required to connect those components to the housing or structure; and
“(ii) includes a blank, casting, or machined body, that requires modification (including machining, drilling, or molding) to be used as part of a functional firearm, and that is designed and intended to be used in the assembly of a functional firearm, unless the blank, casting, or machined body has had—
So much for 80% — or 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, or 10% — unfinished blanks. If it’s vaguely receiver-shaped, and could be worked into a firearm, it would be a firearm. For that matter, the definition is so vague that plumbing suppliers may need an FFL, and to serialize all their pipes.
Next up is the upper/lower receiver problem, where AR-pattern lowers do not meet the definition of receiver in current law.
“(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A)(i), in the case of a weapon with more than 1 part that provides the housing or a structure designed to hold or integrate 1 or more fire control components, each such part shall be considered a frame or receiver, unless the Attorney General has provided otherwise by regulation with respect to the specific make and model of weapon on or before January 1, 2022.
Both upper and lower are each a receiver. Brilliant! Coupled with one-gun-a-month limits, this would prevent you buying a complete AR.
This next bit confuses me. Or maybe it’s Kelly who is confused. Or she’s simply doing a litte housekeeping on US Code.
SEC. 4. REPEAL OF TEMPORARY BRADY PROVISION.
Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (s).
18 U.S. Code § 922(s) is a bit convoluted, but basically it’s the old 5 day handgun waiting period provision; a provision that expired many years ago.
Moving on…
SEC. 5. PHYSICAL SECURITY OF DEALER PREMISES.
This is a collection of physical (safes, bars, reinforced wall, vehicle barricades) and surveillance (lots of cameras, semi-permanent video storage) intended to make running a gun store financially prohibitive. Again.
And because no FFL would ever consider keeping track of his inventory…
SEC. 6. BUSINESS INVENTORY FIREARMS.
Now they would. Apparently Kelly believes in her tiny, shriveled, black heart that dealers have no idea what they’ve got, and don’t care if guns get stolen.
Section 7 gets really nasty.
(b) Records Databases.—Section 923(g) of such title is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“(9) (A) Within 3 years after the date of enactment of this paragraph, the National Tracing Center of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives shall establish and maintain electronic, searchable databases of all records regarding the importation, production, shipment, receipt, sale, or other disposition of firearms required to be submitted by licensees to the Attorney General under this chapter.
You read that correctly. That mandates a searchable database of all firearm transfers. And yes, that includes individual 4473s.
Full gun and gun owner registration.
In Section 9, we have a new requirement for multiple firearm sales; expanded from handguns to… basically eveything. And she slipped in another “high capacity” magazine definition: more than tens rounds, or theoretically modifiable to hold more than tens rounds. There are no exceptions for .22s or fixed internal magazines like tubes.
Here’s another FFL harassment measure.
Sec. 10 “(4) WARNINGS TO PURCHASERS.—All licensed dealers operating a physical retail location shall post conspicuously within the licensed premises all warnings required to be provided to firearms purchasers under applicable State and local law. The Attorney General shall develop materials regarding suicide prevention, securing firearms from loss, theft, or access by a minor or prohibited person, and straw purchasing, and provide the materials to licensed dealers who shall disseminate the materials on transfer of a firearm to a person not licensed under this chapter.”.
By the time they prominently post all that, there’ll be no room for commercial displays.
SEC. 11. INSPECTIONS is a mess. Essentially — and piecemeal — it mandates FFL inspections at least annually. It could be more often, with no limits. Monthly? Weekly? No wonder the Biden administration wants a $1.7 billionincrease in the ATF budget.
Or maybe there won’t be that many FFLs to inspect after all. SEC. 12. AUTHORITY WITH REGARDS TO LICENSE ISSUANCE AND RENEWAL makes FFLs explicitly may-issue.
For those who still manage to get a license, fees would double (Sec. 13).
Read on: It’s got new employee background checks, loss of FFL protections, restrictions on appeals… If you can think of some way to screw dealers, it’s probably there.
The good news is that GovTrack gives this bill a mere 2% chance of passing. Depending on Dim leadership IQs, that may even be — for Dims — optimistic. The midterms are coming, and passage of this bill would likely require election fraud that leaves 2020 in the dust, if Dims expect to win any election. Worst case — for them — is how many abruptly vacant seats would suddenly be up for grabs, due to hordes of irate constituents.
The bad news is that, while this package won’t pass, we will see every individual provision coming back like whack-a-mole.
If killing people has become legal — a bit of news I somehow missed — I’d pay a premium for a Hogg-hunting tag. Not that I’d use it; it would just be worth it for Hogg to simply know he was a lawful target of the people whose rights he wants to violate.
If you need a license to kill deer why don’t you need one to kill humans?
Let’s look at his other non sequiturs.
If you need a license to drive car, cut hair or to hunt you ought to need one to buy a gun.
I only need a license to drive a car on public streets. I don’t need a license to buy one.
I need a license to cut hair professionally, not to buy clippers or cut my own hair or that of family members.
I need a license to hunt some game, not to buy a gun.
There is something of a difference between buying a tool, and using said tool in a specific manner.
But Hogglet is to too g-ddamned stupid to grasp that.
Your right to own a gun with little regulation matters a lot less to me than the rights my classmates had before they were killed.
What do my rights have to do with what a known criminal in another state did to your classmates?
It’s been a while since I delved into the murky world of scholarly pro-victim-disarmament papers. Let’s take a look at Can States Block or Heavily Restrict the Second Amendment Constitutional Right by Following the Design of Texas Bill 8? (PDF). Basically, the weirdos compare the alleged right to abortion to the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms (yet oddly keep talking about licensure). The paper is a difficult to read mess, mainly — I suspect — because they have no frickin’ clue what they’re talking about.
In this research we ask three interrelated questions. First, does the Second Amendment right constitute an afront to International Law’s right to life under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“UDHR”) and the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights (“ICCPR”)? If yes, can states adopt a design similar to Texas Bill 8 to ban or extensively regulate the second amendment right? Finally, what are the intrinsic differences between the right to bearing arms and the right to abortion? If they are intrinsically different, this research calls for examining each of them under a different scrutiny standard. In order to answer the last question, we assess two landmark cases regarding abortion and right to bear arms currently pending before the US Supreme Court, in an attempt to predict the future of those rights.
At the first glance, it follows from a logical point of view that allowing anyone in the street to possess lethal weapons only results in more homicides, assassinations, and general chaos even when initial purchasers meet the arm licensing conditions. [emphasis added]
Only?
Yet the potential dangers surrounding bearing arms did not enter public discourse until after the assassination of John F. Kennedy in 1963.
Not until 1963? I seem to recall something in 1934.
Money quote:
Taking our findings into account, we argue that the US Supreme Court should assess the right to abortion under a strict scrutiny standard, and the right to bearing arms under an intermediate scrutiny standard.
So abortion, not a right until 1973 — and not to be found enumerated anywhere in the Constitution should be given strict scrutiny. But a right recognized by states prior to the Constitution and specifically enumerated therein for more than two centuries should only get intermediate scrutiny?
The second practical concern was to guarantee personal and state autonomy against the federal government. This was influenced by John Locke’s thesis legitimizing revolution against oppression or injustices.36 By examining these practical concerns in the 21st century, they seem to be largely hyper-vigilant. Further, these practical concern could easily be rebutted by the distinction between militia’s right in bearing arms (which is currently substituted by the police force) and bearing arms for personal self-defense.
Ah, NO; the “police force” is not the militia. One might expect a law professor to know something about the law, particularly in an area he chose to write about. But clearly he doesn’t:
Perhaps the majority created this exception on a misreading of history regarding the ban of shotguns and machineguns…
When did that happen? I was aware of registration requirements for machineguns and short-barreled shotguns (the previously linked National Firearms Act of 1934), but when did this alleged ban happen? Anyone? Bueller?
Dear Bog, they even slipped in this BS argument:
In contrast, an accurate originalist interpretation of the second amendment would lead to a contrary result: namely, banning most firearms currently existing since they are not the same – technologically – as the ones existed in the 18th century when James Madison and Thomas Jefferson drafted the second amendment.
The next victim-disarming idiot who uses a smart phone connected to a computer network operating over fiber optic lines to tell me the framers of the Constitution and the Second Amendment never envisioned modern firearms, and that the Second Amendment only protects muskets is getting bitch-slapped.
James Madison, known for his role in drafting the Bill of Rights (including that pesky 2A) lived through the rise of repeating firearms, breechloaders, paper cartridges, percussion caps, metallic cartridges, pinfire cartridges, centerfire cartridges, revolvers, and mass production of firearms.
Consider yourselves slapped, bitches. And recall that repeating firearms predated the very existence of the United States. By centuries. These folks’ knowledge of history is matched only by their knowledge of federal law. Well, lead author Yacoub is an “International Lawyer” practicing in Egypt, so perhaps there’s some slight excuse for his ignorance. But Briggs claims to be a practicing US attorney; G-d save her clients.
Section II of this paper gets interesting, in a morbid way. Now they bring up the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights — more a hash of muh socialism and a checklist of things governments can do to their citizens, than a bill of individual rights — and argue that it trumps the Second Amendment, because life. You see, keeping and bearing arms somehow violates someone’s right to life; but ending a life through abortion doesn’t.
The right to life was specifically mentioned in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR); regional conventions such as the American Convention on Human Rights among others.90 Invoking the right to life was very influential in abolishing the death penalty in many nations.91 Yet the indirect relationship between the right to life and the US constitutional right to bear arms remains unexplored to a large extent.
In the HRC General Comment No. 36 issued in 2018, paragraph four, in particular, connects the right to life and states’ obligation to implement policies so a person is not arbitrarily deprived of their life. “[A]rticle 6 of the Covenant provides that no one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life and that the right shall be protected by law.
No.
Under the Convention, gun control is essential to protecting the right to life. While persons can claim self-defense of the individual person as an exemption to criminal responsibility, it does not trump the fundamental right to life that is inherent in international human rights law.109 Even if there was a so-called “right to self-defense,” States still have a positive legal obligation under the Convention to implement gun control measures to protect their citizens in the collective sense and not the right of one individual to carry a gun.
I said, “No.” An aggressor’s “right to life does not trump my right to self defense — protecting my own life, BTW. And defending myself against a specific individual who attacks me is not arbitrary; I’m not randomly shooting every sixth person that walks past.
I really wanted to analyze this whole mess for you, so you wouldn’t have to. But I’m going to have to stop only a third of the way through, for the sake of my own sanity if nothing else. Feel free to read it yourself. But be aware that it only gets worse.
As a warning of what you’ll encounter, note that these two scholastic schizos have done a number of papers together. My personal morbid favorite is the one where they argue for the United States to adopt Sharia law to “solve the problem of US mass incarceration.”
Beating, hand-chopping and beheading as an alternative to prison time? That might make “the rehabilitative approach of the Icelandic criminal justice model part a bit tough to implement.
Things that you may not be hearing on the corporate media, that might be worth hearing.
First note, that Epoch Times which is a pretty accurate source of news, is using data from the U.K. Why you ask? Because it more honest than what our taxpayer funded agencies dish out. Going way back to the start of the Covid-19 scam. They counted it as a Covid death if they died with Covid, not necessarily from Covid. But other countries followed ferret faced Fauxci’s lead.
A report released by the UK government has confirmed that 9 out of every 10 deaths related to COVID-19 are found in those who are fully vaccinated. Although the virus variant is the same and the UK approved only one different vaccine (AstraZeneca) from the United States, the data in the U.S. are different. This may be due in large part to the CDC definition used to identify who is “vaccinated.”
U.S. data are also likely to become even more sparse in the coming weeks and months. In addition to the CDC hiding data, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) quietly decided in early February to stop recording deaths attributed to COVID-19.
Data Is Essential
Yet, data is the foundation of scientific analysis. Without it, researchers are unable to analyze statistics and draw conclusions, which leaves public health experts unable to make accurate recommendations. Knowledge gives you the power to make informed decisions based on evidence.
Data is essential, yes, yes it is. Knowing honest facts enable one to come to a correct opinion. Otherwise you are someone driving around in a car by yourself wearing a face diaper and re-breathing your own CO2.
The truth is: Yes, there are indeed biological research facilities in Ukraine that have been funded by our government. We don’t have any way to know whether these facilities were conducting research that was intended to produce weapons or not, but we do know that if the pathogens housed in these facilities escaped, they would be just as deadly as as an intentionally produced bioweapon.
Something that should be frontline on every corporate media station but probably will never be. <This message is brought to you by Murderna and Lie-zer. So I have no clue why it isn’t. /sarcasm.
An Indiana-based life insurance company is expressing concern over a substantial rise in deaths in adults eighteen to sixty-four years old in 2021 that cannot be explained simply by covid infections themselves.
What else is hidden? This twitter thread covers many things. Digital currency, programmable digital currency. You thought you were going on a trip? The government says no, and your currency will not pay for that ticket. Quite simple, but it’s all to keep you “safe”, just like that 4th jab Lie-zer CEO is earnestly assuring U.S. is necessary. There are other things in the thread as well, like the WHO global pandemic treaty. Oh that should work out well. The World Homicide Organization, I don’t claim credit for the clever word play, that goes to Dr. Zev.
Hat tip to my buddy in Nicaragua on this one. And what are those 5 things?
FOIA Request Reveals Biden Admin Paid $1 Billion to Corporate Media Outlets to Push Covid Vaccines
Pfizer Data was Quietly Released Listing Well Over 1,200 Adverse Side Effects from the Covid Jab And that just in the first 55,000 pages release, much more to come. Despite their desire to keep the data hidden for 75 years.
State Agents Raid Preschools, Question Toddlers Without Parental Consent for Not Wearing Masks
As Gov’t Sends Billions to Ukraine, Millions of US Children are Being Pushed into Horrible Poverty
Biden Pushing Executive Orders to Make US Gun Owners Felons There will be no vote in Congress and you will have no say in the matter. Instead, Biden is ruling by executive decree.
I think you can pretty much figure everything the world’s governments are pushing their citizens to do is going to be bad for them.
For example those electric cars Ginger Goebbels and “Mayor” Pete Butterhead keep pimping. I won’t even get into the cost of those, monetary and evironmental. But since it has nothing to do with saving the planet, why might they be doing that?
Well, seems to be a done deal. I don’t mean that our gov’t is composed of spineless weasels – that ship has sailed. But now we can expect an unlimited influx of non-Jewish Ukrainians, who have all of Europe to resettle in, and who don’t even pass the required Jewish grandfather clause to move to the one and only Jewish state of Israel. As long as they have some kind of relative living in Israel, the doors are opened to them. And no, having a relative in Israel does not make one Jewish. Plus, don’t think for one moment that if they want to come to Israel that it means they are not Jew-haters. Seriously? That’s almost funny.
One tiny Jewish nation in all of the world, and that’s one too many for some. One tiny country where no one is shocked there is no mass transit and stores aren’t open on Shabbat. One tiny nation where we can live according to G-d’s plan, and that’s one too many. One way or another the nations are determined to kill it, if they can’t in battle they will try from within. Just like the U.S. Our “leaders” and I use that term loosely have betrayed us. They are trying to destroy us from within.
And trying here would be the operative word. As I’ve been watching the dumpster fire known as the Xiden crime family’s administration I’m reminded of something I heard back before the elections. It was something I read, or something I heard. So if it was something I heard, it may have been from Rabbi Alon Anava’s interview with Tamar Yonah, but since this was in 2016 I don’t think this was it, but it’s still very good. https://israelnewstalkradio.com/tamar-yonah-show-nibiru-will-this-dwarf-star-wreak-havoc-on-earth-audio-🎧/
I’ll tell you right up front it was a battle not to quote the whole column it was so good. It was written the day after the “election” but the interviews and comments took place before it. Let the quoting begin. It mentions a video, that has been removed by YouTube. Of course.
Very early in the lecture, Anava declared that, “This election is going to change the entire face of the planet.” …. After his introduction, he spent a considerable amount of time sharing multiple Torah codes related to the presidency of Donald J. Trump and the coronavirus. Most significantly, he explained a fundamental difference between the way Jews and Christians understand Biblical texts. “The whole Torah is coded,” he taught, referring to the Hebrew text. “Many messages are not written in the verses. The text is just the revealed part. Hidden in it are many other messages.” …. Anava referred to both President Trump and contender Joe Biden as “puppets” who will be fulfilling the will of God, whatever happens at the polls. “Regardless of who wins, the outcome will be the same because HaKadosh Baruch Hu (the Holy One, Blessed is He) is driving the train,” Anava asserted. “The whole system is set up to bring the country to civil war, martial law and the end of the US. Either way you look at it, it’s going to bring the country down.
“America is done. America is going to go down and with it, the entire world. Why? Because Hashem is preparing the entire world to bring His messiah – Moshaich ben David (Messiah, son of David) – to come and redeem the entire world, not only the Jews. “There cannot be a redemption if there are governments. There cannot be a redemption if there are world leaders. Moshiach is going to come and remove the world leaders, so it’s really irrelevant who is going to win. …. For Jews and non-Jews, Anava said that, “idolatry is not bowing down to idols. It’s putting your faith in anything but Hashem (such as governments or vaccines). We have to believe only in the Master of the Universe.” Using the coronavirus as an example of how important it is to rely only on God, Anava said, “He’s the One who brought the disease and He’s the One who is going to remove it.”
Then in the same article, they quote another Rabbi also from Tzfat, Chaim David Targan.
The day before the election, Targan wrote that, “Today formally ends the age of the American Empire. If Biden wins, like Rome, America will crash and burn. If Trump prevails, its age will end gracefully, transferring its power, authority and sovereignty fully to the leaders of the geula (redemption) and successfully and joyfully completing the Tikkun of Eisav (Esau’s rectification). This would be great joy to Washington, Jefferson and Adams, who created America through Torah Wisdom as a tikkun for Eisav.” Like Anava, Targan is saying that America’s days are numbered. He adds the nuance that, depending on who ultimately wins yesterday’s election, the end of America will come harshly (under Biden) or gently (under Trump).
Honest, I didn’t quote the whole thing, there’s more there to read! But when I first heard that before the elections it stuck with me. Maybe because Rabbi Anava was involved, and ever since Y.B. Ben Avram, another TZP writer sent me his YouTube story, and like Rabbi Lazer Brody I wanted to learn what they had to teach. But maybe because I knew it was true. I didn’t see how it could be quite the dumpster fire it has become, but apparently I just didn’t realize how much the Xiden crime family regime hated U.S. They tried to hide it.
And that brings me to hidden. Do you know what’s remarkable about the story of Purim? G-d’s name is not mentioned once in the Megillah. His face is hidden. All the events that saved us were not miracles in the classic Red Sea splitting sense. They were miracles of right place, right time, right clout. Such as the king, while he couldn’t change the decree to kill all the Jews, he made another decree the Jews should fight back and defend themselves. Which they did, quite well. But we don’t believe in coincidence, we know who runs this show. We know who created this world and who runs it. This is a fabulous, inspiring article Why Isn’t G‑d’s Name Mentioned in the Megillah? Give yourself a treat and read it.
And with that thought in mind, that it is G-d that runs this show, whether we see his hand in things or not, we do not fear. I admit, I struggle with this from time to time, and one of the things I hold on to is something else I learned from Y.B., Ayin Od Milvado. אין עוד מלבדו There are none beside him.
It is all G-d, all the time, even when we don’t see him and he chooses to remain hidden he is there and like a child calling for their father in the dark of night, he hears us.
Our Torah tells you that you must not fear. Even if an army is charging towards you, you must not fear. For there is no danger worse than fear. But you are only human. Do you truly have control over the dread and panic pounding in your heart? Yes. Not directly, but through the power of your mind. If you will choose not to dwell on those things that instill panic and dread, those emotions will wither and fade. And the choice is yours. What do you want to speak about? What do you want to think about? For the thoughts of your mind are the conduit of life for the emotions of your heart.
Even when we can’t see him or his strong right arm in the events or people, אין עוד מלבדו
Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Are Zebras white with black stripes or black with white stripes? Why do cats stare at nothing? How does a chameleon change colors? A lot like politicians in that respect aren’t they? Why does time go faster as we get older?
There are all kinds of interesting questions. Some of the above have been around for ages. Then there are newer ones. Who planted the pipe bombs at the Demoncratic and Republican headquarters prior to the January 6th rally. If you look at the “news” aka #FakeNews #CorporateMedia stories on this they will say things from “Prior to the insurrection” to “The riot was lead by Trump supporters wanting to…” good grief those people are dishonest. One would think after having read their lying coverage of A) a peaceful political rally and B) an attempt to hold off on certification till some of the voter fraud could be examined, that people would have been a lot more suspicious of their WuFlu reporting. But, some people just have to pee on the electric fence for themselves I guess.
Another interesting question, what’s the deal with the Las Vegas sniper in the Mandalay Bay hotel? I mean that happened in 2017, haven’t they found out anything more since then? I mean I know the FIB is really busy what with chasing parents around who foolishly believe their huge sum of tax dollars means their children are receiving a good quality education and not indoctrination in CRT (Merrick Garland’s son makes his money selling CRT to schools, just by the by) or being groomed to be confused about their gender. I mean with all that on the agenda who has time for math. So the FIB clearly has a mandate to hunt these parents down. But back to my question, isn’t there any new information on that?
Why, yes there is as a matter of fact. Antifa? ISIS? FIB prior knowledge?
Ding ding ding, all of the above.
The link to the page Patrick is referring to at National File
And since sometimes things like web pages disappears….Here’s the .pdf in case it’s gone walk about. I should probably mention it does have some disturbing images. Las Vegas Mandeley Bay Report
It’s good to know these things as President Puddin’ called for more gun citizen control in his state of the nation union.
Anyone tune in to watch it?
The Dumpster Fire that is the State of the Union
Apparently what happens in Vegas does stay in Vegas, or at least in a FIB or ATF file folder buried deep underneath Indiana Jones’s discoveries in the basement of some dank building in DC. Right next to the January 6th political prisoners.
So I guess I haven’t been too subtle about longing to see the beagle torturer and others face the music Nuremberg style. I’ll sell popcorn. Heck, for that I might make popcorn and give it away.
I hear a rumbling in the distance that makes me wonder if these times they are achanging, that the narrative is crumbling. Is the tyranny of communism fixing to go on the run? Interesting things are coming to light. Tools of the purveyors of imposing their elitist one world tyranny are crumbling.
Documents obtained by NATIONAL FILE show that the University of Pennsylvania, which hosts and funds Joe Biden’s think tank called the Penn Biden Center, directly profits from the sale of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna Coronavirus vaccines. The University gets more money if more vaccines are sold. The University of Pennsylvania also gets “milestone payments” when the Biden administration’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves a Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, which represents a massive conflict of interest for Biden. BioNTech pays the University of Pennsylvania Board of Trustees directly, and the university is protected from civil liability if people try to sue for “bodily injury” or “death” caused by BioNTech vaccines.
Impartial fact checkers? Conflict of interest for President Puddin Xiden? What’s new?
A Lancet study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated people in Sweden was conducted among 1.6 million individuals over nine months. It showed that protection against symptomatic COVID-19 declined with time, such that by six months, some of the more vulnerable vaccinated groups were at greater risk than their unvaccinated peers.
Doctors are calling this phenomena in the repeatedly vaccinated “immune erosion” or “acquired immune deficiency”, accounting for elevated incidence of myocarditis and other post-vaccine illnesses that either affect them more rapidly, resulting in death, or more slowly, resulting in chronic illness.
All voices that threaten to shine a light must be silenced. To defeat the darkness, sometimes it only takes a little bit of light to shine in. For example Joe Rogan. This Is Who Is Behind The Joe Rogan Attack He dared allow Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr Robert Malone a platform to share information. It’s pretty interesting though that the attacks are coming from a Demoncrat superPAC, decidedly political, not medical.
I’ve shared the video of Professor Mattias Dsmet on Mass Formation, but I think we’re living in the biggest PsyOp ever. Apparently some people are concerned it might not be ethical. Ya think?
Then we have Canada, oh Canada where the gallant Truckers have Fidel Castro’s boy Justin on the run. Where oh where could he be?
Justin Castro in Beijing Brandon’s basement
Apparently the “small fringe element with wrong thoughts” aren’t actually small and most of Canada agrees with their thoughts. Eh? <did that sound Canadian? I was trying to sound Canadian>
Apparently the Canadian Farmers are also part of the “small fringe who think wrong”. They’ve joined in.
Even running blockades.
And if that weren’t glorious enough, the mounties! Nope, not the jackboots, the cowboys and cowgirls! Hey I could have put in an 11 second clip, but 11 seconds of this is just not enough!
But, tyrants gotta tyrant. Like the picture of Stacey Abrams sitting in all her un-masked glory amidst a sea of poor little children with their face diapers strapped on re-breathing their own CO2 and germs. Rules for thee, not for me.
Apparently it was the city council of Ottawa and the police that urged Go Fraud Me to steal the money hardworking citizens had donated to support the free republic of Truckistan. Where CHAZ was cool with the media and “Summer of Love” Durkin, a peaceful protest is a insurrection and a threat. I guess they haven’t shot anyone or burned any buildings. There was one guy who showed up with a “confederate” flag. Apparently the FIB didn’t think this one through well. The crowd outted him as a plant and he slunk away. So Go Fraud Me who supported and ran fundraisers for Burn Loot and Murder don’t want any part of honest hardworking citizens. Except their money of course. Go Fraud Me was going to steal the money and redistribute it to whomever they wanted. We aren’t talking chump change. We’re talking 10 million. Funny how the threat of a senate investigation can get a corrupt company’s mind right.
Your boos…
Truckistan is peaceful, they’ve erected bouncy houses! Oh the inhumanity of it all! Bouncy houses! When will the terror stop?
But this shall not deter Fidel Castro’s son Justin, a chip off the old block. Nor shall it deter the jackbooted police who have begun confiscating fuel from the truckers. Many of the truckers are there with their with their families. They are trying to freeze them out in the frigid weather. What’s a few frozen children to the chief of police, the city council and Justin Castro?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1490497282827067401
But Canadians are a plucky lot! After the police threaten the supporters if they give fuel to the truckers they will be arrested the Canadians immediately backed down. Just kidding. EVERYBODY in Ottawa is walking around with gas cans. Some full, some not.
But back to the kids for a moment. As we know, the feckless FDA is approving the Murder shots for the children. Children who will be the test subjects, our children and grandchildren. The brilliant Steve Kirsch has a way we can all pitch in to stop it. It will take about 45 seconds out of your life. How you can help persuade the FDA committee not to approve Pfizer for kids under 5
Have you wondered why does Big Pharma and Fauxci (but I repeat myself) push so hard to get this unknown and untested substance injected into children? It’s about immunity. Not for the children, for the drug companies. Robert Kennedy Jr explained how this works. If it’s on the schedule of childhood vaccines, the drug companies can’t be sued even if it’s given to adults. Why are the drug companies so worried? It’s safe and effective.
Be brave, stand firm
So I saved the bestest for last. While most of the videos have been just clips, this is the whole thing. If you haven’t heard, there is a trial going on. And we the people are the jury. The name of the trial? Crimes Against Humanity. The web site is here https://www.grand-jury.net/ This is modeled after the Grand Jury structure. There will be evidence presented. There are lawyers from all over the world, actual doctors and scientists and vaccine injured individuals. This is the opening day. I hope you will watch it, and share it. The more people that realize this is taking place the more traction it will gain. May G-d bless and prosper their efforts as they shine light.
Jews. Guns. No compromise. No surrender.
Password Reset
Please enter your e-mail address. You will receive a new password via e-mail.
