Fathers, Here There and Everywhere

I admit it, from time to time I get very discouraged about the state of our country. It seems like the evil is rolling in unchecked. Peaceful law abiding citizens are in a gulag that is worse than the conditions of the terrorists at Gitmo. Parents concerned about critical race theory are labeled terrorists and harassed by a man who is head of the DOJ and who’s son-in-law makes his living off selling CRT materials to schools. And now following the dictator’s playbook they have decided to start trying to outlaw defensive tools. Food processing plants and livestock are burning, dying, or just in general not making it into the food supply chain. The Xiden crime regime is still pushing the deadly death darts and Cacklin’ Kamela is the new head of the ministry of truth. All pretty bad, eh?

But then this weeks Torah portion. This weeks portion is Beha’alotecha. It’s Numbers (Bemidbar-In The Desert) 8:1-12:16.

Fair warning, I’m totally unqualified to teach on this. But this is what spoke to me and why I find so much encouragement in our situation today.

From the 6th reading, the incident at Tav’eirah (blaze). The reading has been discussing the signals to travel and to rest, then it comes to a part where they are resting. The mixed multitude (non-Jews that traveled with them when they left Egypt) begin to re-think this submitting to G-d’s laws and so they search for an excuse to to avoid them. First they complain about how they were able to travel three days journey in one day. A mercy G-d gave them so they could get into the land quicker. This didn’t go down well, so G-d sent a fire down to consume the worst of them. The ones that hadn’t gotten as bad wised up and begged Moshe to intercede for them, which he did. But you know who else the fire consumed? The 70 elders, that should have known better and should have taught the people better. It probably is terrible to say, but this made me stop and think. Huh, leaders that should have been leaders and didn’t, pay a price. People that are leaders and shirk their duty for personal gain pay a price. At least that time they sure did.

Then the mixed multitude, these people are troublemakers, began to grow wistful for the bonds of slavery, for being beaten, starved and having no real say in their lives. Living under G-d’s rules for a healthy moral society was so cumbersome you see! Even though G-d fed them manna every day, which would take on the flavor of whatever a person desired they began to whine and cry “We want meat! Who will give us meat!” Yes, they have flocks and herds with them, but that is still what they whined. And then the Israelis joined in.

They weren’t done, “Oh, we miss cucumbers, watermelons, leeks, and the fish we ate so enjoyably in a relaxed atmosphere free of divine obligations. Kid you not! They were slaves in Egypt, what relaxed atmosphere? At this point in the lesson I’m picturing Moshe and Aaron standing side by side with identically dropped jaws doing a simultaneous face palm.

G-d is now really angry, Moshe knows it’s evil and this is the ninth, ninth time the people have challenged G-d’s ability to provide for them. Nine. NINE. Not that I’m perfect and blameless on all counts but it seems like a lot to me. And that reminds me of all the times G-d has miraculously helped me. Looking back at my opening, G-d was, is and will be.

But this meat thing gets on his nerves. Moshe is beside himself, he wants to know why G-d had placed the burden of these people on his shoulders alone. He wants to know where he’s going to get meat for all of them? And besides that the original 70 elders are well done. I can’t do it.

But G-d is his father, and our father. He tells Moshe to replace the errant elders who didn’t do their job by taking 72 tickets and writing elder on 70 of them and leave two blank. Then to take 6 elders from each tribe. That’s 72, but only 70 will become elders.

Ah, simple paper ballots lead to good voting outcomes. G-d voted and the 70 he wanted became elders. No Dominion voting machines involved. Paper and done! I’m sure there is a message in there!

Next onto the meat. G-d provides meat aplenty for his children, for a month. Until they are sick of it. To be more specific the worst of the complainers died when they first ate it, the others died over the month. G-d provided enough quail for over 600,000 people for over a month. In one day while Moshe and the elders were in their tents as it pains the righteous to see the wicked punished. I think I need to work on myself as I personally want to see Nuremberg II televised and I can about guarantee a better viewing audience than the Jan 6 clown show.

But what do I find in this? That G-d is in control. Of everything. He can deal with the mixed multitude, he can deal with antifa and BLM. He can deal with the derelict elders, he can deal with RINOs and McConnell and McCarthy that sell the people out. While there was no food shortage and the manna could taste like cherry cheesecake, chocolate cheesecake, key lime cheesecake or coffee cheesecake or even non-cheesecake foods (why?) when the people wanted meat, G-d supplied it. Nothing is too great for G-d. Where I sometimes get off track is what is in my will and what is in his will. I think of something my Rabbi told me a few years ago. It was in relation to a totally unrelated situation to this, but he said “G-d can do anything he wants anytime he wants”, and when something I never thought would happen did, I heard his voice saying that. I was in awe for months!

I was blessed with the best father a girl could have. My dad never said “Oh no, girls don’t need to learn how to do this, or no girls don’t do that sort of thing”. If I wanted to learn and he knew how, he taught me. When I bought a farm with no running water and an outhouse, he and Mom came down and helped me work on it almost every day till I could live in it. I still remember when I got indoor plumbing, and I was living here for a while before that happened. Short Dad story, as I had an outhouse and Dad hated it that I had to go outside after dark to use the outhouse, he saw a chamber pot at a garage sale. As he paid for it the lady asked him if his wife was going to plant flowers in it? He told her no, it was for his daughter to use at night so she didn’t have to go outside to the outhouse. I’m still chuckling and smiling as I type this. Dang I miss my Dad. He was Roy Rogers and John Wayne all rolled into one. My Dad is the Dad there, in B’Shaymime.

G-d of the Torah portion is the father everywhere, nothing is too big for him. Not corrupt politicians, not the decline of our country. Not even me as I struggle to know more and do better. He doesn’t throw in the towel. He knows everything including my heart better than I know it myself. I don’t know how this plays out. I don’t. I know that I’m responsible for doing what he puts in front of me to do. To keep suiting up and showing up. But he is the father who is everywhere and I can and do talk to him about everything.

For the fathers here, I’m giving you a fabulous movie, a very short tribute to fantastic fathers.

Happy fathers day to all the men out there. Even if you aren’t fathers, you had one. And we’re glad for that because you’re here.

Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail

Just Once, I Want To See An Honest “Gun Control” Poll

Our bipartisan gang-rape Senators are trying to force a vote next week on the proposed package of new rights infringements despite the troubling fact that there is still no actual Senate bill filed.

I guess we have to pass it so we can see what’s in it.

But that lack of information isn’t stopping pollsters trying to claim support for the “bill.” Republican pollster Neil Newhouse alleges that 84% of gun-owning Americans support the imaginary-to-date legislation.

Oh, really? Let’s take a look at that poll. I see a few problems.

To start, they only polled those stupid enough to admit to a random, anonymous caller that they have at least one firearm in the home. But it’s much worse than that.

Respondents in the telephone portion of this survey were called from a national list of registered voters, and respondents in the online portion were drawn from a national panel of registered voters.

The caller might be anonymous, but anyone foolish enough to participate wasn’t. They started with a list of names and phone numbers of specific identified voters. Participants just told strangers who can match their “Yes, I have portable valuables in the house” answers to names and physical addresses.

Gee, what else did the pollsters ask about?

Do you have a large screen television?

Do you own easily pawned jewelry?

Do you own a nice laptop computer?

What time do you leave your home for the day?

So now we’ve limited that 84% to a pool of gullible fools.

As always in these things, the polling questions are a mess.

A mandatory waiting period on all purchases of semi-automatic guns, like the AR-15, by people under 21, so that everyone who purchases a semi-automatic gun must wait a certain number of days before taking the gun home.

That wording is going to mislead known fools into thinking that’s only a waiting period for AR-pattern firearm purchases. As best I can tell from press releases — lacking an actual bill to review — that it would apply to all centerfire semi-automatic firearms.

Then they could ask what other Constitutionally [used to be] protected rights they think should be restricted to those over 21.

Should the exercise of free speech be limited to those over 21?

Should voting be limited to those over 21?

Should the right to a trial and jury of your peers to be limited to those over 21?

Moving on…

Requiring background checks on all gun sales, including between strangers at gun shows and online. Gun sales between family, friends and hunters would be exempted from background checks.

Nothing I’ve see suggests any exemption for friends and hunters is in the deal. But even if they were exempted, I’d much rather see the question phrased differently. “Requiring background checks on all gun sales, including between strangers at gun shows and online. The check would require seller and buyer to travel to a licensed firearm dealer, and complete a form 4473 giving the ATF your name, address, gender, birth date, and race, creating a permanent searchable record of your purchase. During the waiting period, the dealer would take physical possession of the firearm. After the waiting period is complete, only then would you return to the dealer to obtain the property for which you already paid. Oh, and you have to pay extra for this dubious privilege.”

Next.

Increased funding for states to implement and strengthen so called “red flag” laws, which gives family or law enforcement a way to petition a judge to temporarily remove guns from someone who is exhibiting violent or unstable behavior.

Nope. Current law already allows that. What “red flag” laws do is expand the pool of people who can request removal, and — wait for it — do so without giving the accused a hearing — and the opportunity to face his accuser — before the taking.

I’d ask that: “Increased funding for states to implement and strengthen so called “red flag” laws, which violate federal law on due process, and the TRUAX Supreme Court ruling, to ensure that gun owners do not get a court hearing before their property is stolen.”

And the return of the “boyfriend loophole.

Prohibiting any person from purchasing or owning firearms who has been convicted of domestic violence against their boyfriend, girlfriend, spouse or significant other.

Perpetuating the lie. As phrased, that is already what the Lautenberg Amendment did decades ago. This new bit slips in the alleged “boyfriend loophole;” what closing that loophole really does is to expand the definition of boy/girlfriend from a significant romantic relationship to he picked me up in a bar for a one night stand thirty years ago. I’d probably mention that this specifically includes minor misdemeanor offenses, not just felonies.

The remaining questions pertain to school security, notably armed guards.

Support increased funding for public schools to have armed security guards on school property.

Aside from the curious omission of private school security, I’d suggest that’s insufficient. Given the notable lack of police action at Columbine, Parkland, and Uvalde, they should slide in some penalties for cops who don’t do anything but treat the event like a unscheduled coffee break.

Ah, well. I’m just dreaming. Short of winning lottery jackpot, and commissioning my own national polls, we will never see an honest victim disarmament poll.

 

Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.
Click here to donate via PayPal.

(More Tip Jar Options)
Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail

Senate Victim Disarmament Coming

In a show of bipartisanship gang rape Republicans are already capitulating on Second Amendment rights.

As expected.

Dim Senator Chris Murphy ran down the list of new, planned infringements in a Twitter thread.

Major funding to help states pass and implement crisis intervention orders (red flag laws) that will allow law enforcement to temporarily take dangerous weapons away from people who pose a danger to others or themselves.

State-level due process violations, instead of federal. This is actually fairly clever for semi-sapient Senators; a single federal red flag law could be challenged once and done. Fifty laws in fifty different jurisdictions will tie up more of pro-rights people’s and groups’ time and money.

Billions in new funding for mental health and school safety, including money for the national build out of community mental health clinics.

Will those clinics be facilities where the dangerously mental ill can be institutionalized, and get real help, instead of handing out Bluetooth headsets and letting them wander the streets?

Close the “boyfriend loophole”, so that no domestic abuser – a spouse OR a serious dating partner – can buy a gun if they are convicted of abuse against their partner.

I’ll need to see the actual bill language, but that’s essentially expanded ex post facto re-sentencing for misdemeanor convictions. While these idiot senators are patting themselves on their backs, prosecutors are likley to see that — mandatory ex post facto life sentences — as something a plea deal-breaker.

First ever federal law against gun trafficking and straw purchasing.

First ever?

18 U.S. Code § 922 – Unlawful acts

(a)It shall be unlawful—
(1)for any person—
(A)except a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer, to engage in the business of importing, manufacturing, or dealing in firearms, or in the course of such business to ship, transport, or receive any firearm in interstate or foreign commerce; or

And if straw purchases aren’t illegal, how the heck was this woman convicted for straw purchases?

Enhanced background check for under 21 gun buyers and a short pause to conduct the check. Young buyers can get the gun only after the enhanced check is completed.

Reportedly that mean opening up juvenile criminal records to searches. But… either the entire NICS gets the addition, or dealers will have to make two separate check calls if a customer is under 21. Plus a waiting period. Any bets on which they decide is more efficient?

Clarification of the laws regarding who needs to register as a licensed gun dealer, to make sure all truly commercial sellers are doing background checks.

“Clarification” would nice. We’ve only been asking for that since the Clinton administration. But the devil is in the details: “all truly commercial sellers.”

All commercial seller already have to be licensed; see 18 U.S. Code § 922 above. Rather than clarification, this is going to be redefinition, setting a new number of sales threshold, and I’d be willing to bet that it will include what were private sellers at gun shows.

Or worse. In recent years, I’ve seen multiple state-level attempts to redfine “commercial sale.”

“We ask them to increase the background check system to expand it to cover commercial sales – that’s gun shows, online sales, anytime an individual is selling to a stranger,” says Goddard.

In Virginia a person who does not have an FFL can buy and sell guns at gun shows and from their own homes. They can advertize the availability of guns via the internet at specialist site such as Armslist.com and many others. They can even advertize the availability of guns via local newspapers etc.

These treacherous turncoats claim to have ten Republicans on board with this already; enough to invoke cloture and pass these bills. So we’re looking at the end of lawful private sales.

My unduly elected Senators are Dims who brag on this stuff. But if your Senators might be reachable, contact them to let them know what you think. At the very least, you can explain how unwelcome they’ll be back home should this stuff pass.

 

Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.
Click here to donate via PayPal.

(More Tip Jar Options)
Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail

Media Responsibility Or Gun Responsibility?

Devarrick Turner, a Gannett “Multimedia Entertainment Journalist” deigns to lecture more knowledgeable Americans on the alleged difference between “gun responsibility” vs. “gun control.”

Mass shootings spark debate over ‘gun responsibility’ vs. ‘gun control.’ Here’s the difference
Opponents believe strict gun laws infringe upon their Second Amendment right to bear arms. Some Second Amendment supporters — like actor Matthew McConaughey, whose hometown is Uvalde — are now using the term gun responsibility instead of gun control.

responsibility: 1: the quality or state of being responsible: such as
a: moral, legal, or mental accountability
b: RELIABILITY, TRUSTWORTHINESS

Since individuals are already legally responsible for the criminal misuse of firearms, however obtained or possessed, I can only assume that Turner wants to legislate morality. That rarely turns out well, since three people can barely agree on what is moral all the time.

Mandatory background checks for gun purchases, including at private sales and gun shows, which current federal law does not require.

Private sales, no matter the location, do not require background checks, and never have. Why, after 246 years is this suddenly a problem?

Commercial sales at gun shows have required background checks for more than two decades. How did the oh-so-knowledgeable Turner miss this minor fact?

“Red flag” laws that temporarily seize firearms from individuals who have been may be a danger to themselves or others. These must be court-ordered and due process must be applied to assess the individual and the alleged threat.

5 CFR § 732.301; TRUAX, 1921; and GOLDBERG v. KELLY, 1970 require due process that allows the accused a hearing before an action against the accused to be taken. Can Mr. Turner specify which enacted “red flag” law gives the accused a hearing before firearms are seized?

Implement a national waiting period for assault rifles purchases.

According to the ATF, it currently takes five months to process an application for an assault rifle. How much longer does Turner propose that buyer wait?

I suspect that Turner’s apparent confusion is based in ignorance of what an assault rifle is.

Raise the age limit to buy AR-15 rifles (gun often used in mass shootings) from 18 to 21.

How does Turner define “often used”? I can only find one mass shooting in which Colt AR-15s were used: Mandalay Bay, in Las Vegas, Nevada.

It’s true that I found many other claims of AR-15s being used, but like the Orlando nightclub shooting (SIG MCX), those usually prove to be some other weapon. Handguns are used in most mass shootings. Federal law already requires one to be 21yo to purchase those from a dealer.

But if the minimum age to purchases rifles in raised to 21, how will Turner reconcile that with MILLER, 1939 and 10 U.S. Code § 246 which require those 17 to 45 to possess arms in common military use.

Laws that require safe storing protocols and safety training to increase responsible gun ownership.

Outside of urban areas, Georgia residents, for instance, commonly keep firearms ready to deal with snakes and other wildlife. In urban environments they are kept to deal with criminal wildlife. How will you compensate those people for their loss of safety? We encounter one of those “legislating morality” issues here: I do not consider it moral to force honest folks to lock up their defensive tools. “Safe storage” kills.

There is also the matter of ensuring compliance with “safe storage” laws. How is that to be done? Does Turner propose door to door searches of homes for firearms, and charges for those found not to be stored in compliance with whatever arbitrary rules he wants?

Or will Turner require owners to admit, when reporting a lost or stolen firearm, that gun was not “safely stored?” I think that would run afoul of HAYNES restrictions on self-incrimination.

Before pushing to regulate morality, Turner would do well to educate himself on current laws, and what exactly firearms are. To do otherwise might seem… irresponsible.

[Turner was asked to comment before publication. He did not respond.]

 

Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.
Click here to donate via PayPal.

(More Tip Jar Options)
Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail

A Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words

I’ve heard it said a picture is worth a thousand words, so this is going to be a really really long column! There have been all kinds of pity memes going around lately, many of them dealing with citizen control and on Fakebook and other social media sites people are sharing and swapping them around like baseball trading cards. Back when there was baseball…and trading cards worth trading.

So here we go, I have a few, very few for me links I am putting in to relevant stories that in my mind apply to the meme.

We shall start with what set off the latest round of calls for citizen control. The Uvalde killer who has been labeled in the corporate (biased) media as “bullied”. As per usual, they have it bass akwards.

Teen Who Knew Uvalde Shooter Drops Bomb About Him

HE was the bully, and pro-tip? Anyone, and I mean anyone, who walks around with a bag of dead cats he’s beaten to death is not normal. This is why we have animal cruelty laws.

Texas School Shooter’s Grandfather Says He Barely Spoke to His Grandson Who Lived w/ Him https://rumble.com/v16883j-texas-school-shooters-grandfather-says-he-barely-spoke-to-his-grandson-who-.html

Now does this sound normal to you? And that was a really nice truck his grandma had as well. Looked very expensive. I feel very sorry for her, she tried to help the kid and he shot her then stole her really nice truck.

I have other questions.

How DID the shooter get all that gear? He had a minimum wage job.

So now the hue and cry to get rid of “assault weapons”.

You say potato, I say potato, it’s the same rifle.

But it seems that our (in their minds) rulers have inconsistent ideas about who lawful gun owners should be. For instance, take Ukraine.

Ukraine gets rocket launchers
Biden Will arm our enemies however.

U.S. Senate approves aid to Ukraine, blocks aid to small businesses on same day

Another 40 billion gone

Oh, well, good to see where the priorities of American politicians are, right? Because they aren’t with U.S.!

Then you have exceedingly stupid politicians and even dumber talking heads on the corporate (Pfizer sponsored) media yammering on about how The Second Amendment was never meant to include modern weapons. And that might be a fun column to do in the near future. But for now, WWGWS

What would George Washington say?

Ah George, we need you now!

Fine

We can do it your way.

So then there is the talk about mandatory buy backs and confiscation. Doesn’t it seem odd a burgler is pushing to have law-abiding citizens disarmed? It’s almost like he wants to make it a “safer work environment”…for criminals.

Beta male hypocrisy

And about trusting the government to keep us safe? HAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHHAHAHAHA and more.

Universal background check
Waco Tx

But if it’s really really about preventing death…

Gun death vs Vax death

But since I want to end this column on a happy note:

First they came

And this is around 12,464 words! In two pages.

Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail

Fourth Circuit Didn’t get The Memo

I’m not sure why The Gun Feed just picked up this 2017 story. But so long as they have, let’s look at some judicial stupidity. It never hurts to be ready to argue the next — inevitable — infringement case.

Assault Weapons Not Protected by Second Amendment, Federal Appeals Court Rules
“Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war,” Judge Robert King wrote for the court, adding that the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller explicitly excluded such coverage.

First, the assertion that HELLER “explicitly excluded” Second Amendment protection of “assault weapons” is such a gross misstatement of the decision that I can only consider King’s claim to be a blatant, intentional lie.

If it is indeed the case, as the District believes, that the number of guns contributes to the number of gun-related crimes, accidents, and deaths, then, although there may be less restrictive, less effective substitutes for an outright ban, there is no less restrictive equivalent of an outright ban.

HELLER found that less restrictive measures than an outright ban must be considered. Note especially that HELLER overturned the District’s outright ban on handguns. For the terminally clueless, they’re were specifying strict scrutiny.

At least dissenting Judge William Traxler got it.

“For a law-abiding citizen who, for whatever reason, chooses to protect his home with a semi-automatic rifle instead of a semi-automatic handgun, Maryland’s law clearly imposes a significant burden on the exercise of the right to arm oneself at home, and it should at least be subject to strict scrutiny review before it is allowed to stand.”

Yes; strict scrutiny, to weigh whether any lesser restriction than an outright ban would suffice to meet the government’s alleged interest.

But let us turn our attention to the other factor that King and the Fourth missed.

“Weapons of war” are the only class of weapons that the US Supreme Court HAS ruled to be specifically protected by the Second Amendment.

MILLER, 1939
The signification attributed to the term Militia appears from the debates in the Convention, the history and legislation of Colonies and States, and the writings of approved commentators. These show plainly enough that the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. ‘A body of citizens enrolled for military discipline.’ And further, that ordinarily when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time.

Required. And “common use” — note that the short-barreled shotgun test in question in MILLER specified common military use, not sporting use — would seem to apply to 20 MILLION AR-pattern weapons of the sort this very Court called “weapons of war.”

Common, militia-suitable arms.

It appears to me that ten injustices on the Fourth Circuit needed to be impeached; for sheer incompetence, if not outright malfeasance.

 

Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.
Click here to donate via PayPal.

(More Tip Jar Options)
Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail

No Right Is Absolute?

As seen at David Codrea’s The War On Guns:

So long as they’re on an infringement roll…

AMENDMENT XXIV – Passed by Congress August 27, 1962. Ratified January 23, 1964.
Section 1.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay poll tax or other tax.

So poll taxes to keep out the riffraff are back on the table?

AMENDMENT XXVI – Passed by Congress March 23, 1971. Ratified July 1, 1971.
Section 1.
The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.

Hmmm… Unless we red flag someone because he might vote irresponsibly? I suppose that could apply to the 16th Amendment as well.

Or maybe, just maybe… this is the one the “no right is absolute” crowd really have in mind.

AMENDMENT XIII –
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Hey, if we’re going to chuck the Constitution, why not go all out?

 

Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.
Click here to donate via PayPal.

(More Tip Jar Options)
Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail

You’d Think That Gropin’ Joe Would Know What A Child Is

p[R]esident (when he’s not on vacation) Biden wants gun control; for the children.

President Joe Biden said that for the last two decades guns have killed more children in the U.S. than “than on-duty police officers and active duty military combined.”

Really?

The FDA defines “child” as 2-12 yo.

The Army Times reported 15,851 active duty military deaths… for 2006-2018. Do note that short period, somewhat less than 2000-2020. If we attempt to fill in the periods of 2000-2005 and 2019-2020, using Wikipedia, we get a total of 18,381 mil deaths.

The National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund lists 3,746 for 2000-2020. So we’re looking at a total of 22,127 military and LE deaths.

WISQARS says that, for 2000-2020, there were 4,547 firearm-related deaths (all intents) for 2-12yos (that FDA definition of “child”).

We already see that senile Gropin’ Joe is lying through his teeth. Again.

Let’s see what happens when we broaden the definition of child, and check that against WISQARS.

0-12: 5,032
0-13: 6,515
0-14: 9,265
0-15: 14,049
0-16: 21,344
0-17: 31,780

At last we exceed mil/LE deaths. If Xiden had claimed minors’ deaths, he might have a vague point. But he said “children.”

That’s quite an interesting jump in minors deaths when you include teenagers; and a jump of ten thousand when you include 17yos. Would I be out of line if I wondered if they should be looking at a gang problem, instead of guns?

And what would the mil/LE numbers look like if we limited those to people killed “by” (with, damnit) guns?

Biden’s puppeteers are manipulating and twisting data on “children” to inflict rights infringements on everyone, of all ages.

It could be (probably will be) worse. Everytown released a report using the term “youth” which astonishingly includes ten year-olds to…

24yos.

When I was 24, I’d been in the Air Force for five years; I was a Staff Sergeant, an NCOIC, and overseeing multi-million dollar contracts.

To Everytown, that’s the same as a 10yo child.

Whatever it takes to manipulate gullible minds.

 

Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.
Click here to donate via PayPal.

(More Tip Jar Options)
Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail

Jackson-Lee Has A Little Correlation Issue

Texas Congresscritter Sheila Jackson-Lee is generally good for entertaining stupidity, and this is no exception.

Jackson Lee: There Was ‘Seismic Increase of Carnage Across America Using Automatic Weapons’ after Assault Weapons Ban Expired
Jackson Lee said, “I have committed, over the years, having introduced bills dealing with the ban on assault weapons post-2004, as you well know, Ayman, that’s when it ended. And we saw the seismic increase of carnage across America using automatic weapons. And in the instance of Buffalo and the instance of Uvalde, having gone there on Sunday, meeting with and just listening to the sheer desperation of families and children. That was an AR-15 as well.”

I’m sure even the most casual TZP reader caught the main problem, but let me take this a point at a time.

I’ll start with that skyrocketing use of “automatic weapons, known legally as machineguns. Happily for us, TZP tracks machinegun use, so the data I want is readily available.

Right off, I hope you noticed that machinegun use is pretty darned rare. The next thing to notice is that prior to the misnomered “assault weapon ban” (it banned zero existing firearms) in 1994, there had been ONE reported machinegun use since 1981.

Next, note that after the “AWB” expired in 2004 there… huh, zero machine uses for the next 13 years.

That doesn’t look like much of a correlation between the AWB expiration and automatic weapon use. But do take a look between those red lines indicating when the AWB was in effect.

Three machinegun uses.

Lessee… virtually no machinegun uses prior to the ban, a “jump” (kinda statistically meaningless really, seeing as how small the samples are) during the ban, and a drop to nonexistent use once the ban expired. If I suffered a traumatic brain injury and turned into a Dimocrat, I’d probably think that the “assault weapon ban” caused machinegun use.

Heck, if I were a Dimocrat, I’d probably think the AWB caused machineguns.

But on to the point that probably had folks muttering before all that. I had recently had cause to revisit the “Assault Weapon Ban” of 1994. It didn’t address automatic weapons — machineguns — at all.

It shall be unlawful for a person to manufacture, transfer, or possess a semiautomatic assault weapon.

Machinegun use “increased” (though it didn’t) post-AWB? Jackson-Lee might as well have noted that US egg production increased post-AWB. At least that actually happened. But showing a cause and effect relation between the two might be a little difficult.

But Jackson-Lee’s real point is in that final sentence.

That was an AR-15 as well.

It was actually a Daniel Defense DDM4, not a Colt AR-15 (how many people realize that “AR-15” is a registered trademark of Colt?), but we understand that she’s attempting to “smear” all AR-pattern rifles as “automatic weapons”…

Just as Josh Sugarmann intended

“The weapons’ menacing looks, coupled with the public’s confusion over fully automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons—anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun—can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons.”

The lie lives on. Along with this classic repeated by Jackson-Lee.

So, there’s a gathering around recognizing that assault weapons kill. They killed 19 children and two teachers.”

The known psycho wielding the rifle (singular) killed those people, with a rifle.

100+ million people with tens of millions of AR-pattern firearms DID NOT.

But blame the 0.000005% of inanimate objects for the actions of <0.000001% of gun owners.

 

Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.
Click here to donate via PayPal.

(More Tip Jar Options)
Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail