Mask of the Blood Dancers

In response to a convicted felon on probation, under a restraining order, killing 3, and injuring 14 “Gabrielle Giffords” is dancing in the blood:

Gabrielle Giffords ‏@GabbyGiffords: In just the last week, 11 mass shootings have brought terror and tragedy to our country. This is not the America we strive for. #Hesston

Yes. This is exactly what “you” are striving for: a world in which honest people have to preemptively prove their innocence just to hope to exercise their right to self defense against murderous thugs who recognize no such restrictions. Helpless targets, so bastards like Ford can victimize them in perfect safety. Unarmed people in magical gun free zones that never work.

But no doubt, every time the policies that “you” push enable another horrific incident like this, you can call for more action that somehow requires more people to donate more money to your little Criminals’ Workplace Safety organization.

So I guess “you’re” happy.

I actually feel sorry for Gabby Giffords. Unless she has recently made a miraculous recovery, it’s unlikely that she formed that thought and typed that tweet. Medical professionals who are familiar with the sort of bullet-induced brain trauma that Giffords suffered, and who have observed her public appearances, tell me — while carefully noting it’s only a general observation and not a valid diagnosis, since they haven’t examined her –that her behavior is consistent with extreme brain damage that she will never further recover from; that most likely her understanding of the world, much less victim disarmament, is that of a young, innocent child. And always will be.

Giffords is most likely perpetual child who just wants to please the nice people surrounding her. One being used by her own husband, Mark Kelly, and the gun people controlling puppeteers around her. Think on the utter lack of morals and ethics it takes to abuse and manipulate a trusting child like that. Contempt only begins to describe my thoughts about them.

Then consider what Mark Kelly et al would be willing to do to everyone else, whom they don’t obstensibly love and care for.

Gabby Giffords is the mask that the victim disarmers use to hide the true face of gun control.


Ed. note: This commentary appeared first on TZP’s weekly email alert. If you would lik>e to be among the first to see new commentary (as well as to get notice of new polls and recaps of recent posts), please sign up for our alert list. (See sidebar or, if you’re on a mobile device, scroll down). Be sure to respond when you receive your activation email!

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinteresttumblrmail

7 thoughts on “Mask of the Blood Dancers”

  1. Medical professionals who are familiar with the sort of bullet-induced brain trauma that Giffords suffered, and who have observed her public appearances, tell me — while carefully noting it’s only a general observation and not a valid diagnosis, since they haven’t examined her –that her behavior is consistent with extreme brain damage that she will never further recover from; that most likely her understanding of the world, much less victim disarmament, is that of a young, innocent child.

    I’m not a medical professional, but that’s what I’ve been saying. Her speech patterns consist of short, simple words and sentences, and her gestures are awkward and childlike. Her public appearances are fully-scripted, with no deviation. She isn’t allowed to answer questions on her own. And most importantly, she doesn’t go ANYWHERE without her husband/handler, Mark “Straw Purchase” Kelly, who “speaks for her”.

    I don’t believe she has the mental or emotional capacity to understand what she’s being told to say saying. She’s just being used, like a tool.

    That her husband sees fit to use her like this, speaks volumes of his moral character.

    1. A few months ago, I did see one interview that was just her and an overly-sympathetic interviewer. Giffords would reply sporadically with disjointed words — never a complete sentence, no matter how simple — that didn’t have much to do with the questions. Whereupon the interviewer then answered her own questions for her.

    2. 1) Being an anti gun liberal is, in itself, indicative of brain damage.
      2) Giffords would have you believe that taking a bullet in the head makes you an expert on guns. I say getting bit by a rattlesnake does not make you a herpetologist. Giffords is simply a Lib with lead poisoning in the head in addition to to the congenital condition causing Lib perspectives. I had some sympathy for her initially, she was ambushed by a nut case. But her blood dancing has crossed a line as far as I am concerned.

      1. I still have deep sympathy for Gabby. She doesn’t understand what’s going on around her. She lacks the capacity.

        As such, I can’t blame her. In my mind, she’s no longer a Liberal. She’s not a blood-dancer (yes, she dances in blood, but bear with me here). She doesn’t have the mental awareness or cognizance required to act on her own.

        She’s a tool, a puppet. I can’t hold a puppet accountable for what it does, be it dancing on a stage or dancing in blood. Therefore I can’t blame Gabby for what she says or what is done in her name. She goes where the strings are pulled; she can’t do otherwise. She deserves our pity.

        The puppetmaster, on the other hand, deserves our derision and utmost contempt. And we know who Gabby’s puppetmaster is.

  2. What happened to Gabby Gifford is a tragedy, that goes without saying. But the way her husband and other parade her around adds insult to her injury.
    The most telling thing about her handlers is the fact that they WANT it happen again. They wait breathlessly for the next tragedy to exploit. These people have no shame!

    1. I have to agree, but of course, the problem is, there will certainly come another instance of firearm violence to occur in this country. There are over 320 million people here and probably that many guns as well, with untold numbers of crazies, terrorists, and just plain evil people out there. Add to this the fact that one can never just what the media will take up as their next rallying point, around which they can build a firestorm of half truths and false outrage, and one can only wait for the next Sandy Hook, or San Bernadino, or Ft.Hood to happen.
      That Gabby, a liberal, is now being used as a shill, is almost poetic justice. I wonder if it is in some small way working. Usually, if something doesn’t work, it is quickly abandoned, in favor of something else. But with the gun debate seeming to have shifted in favor of the gun supporters, I think that the liberals, although certainly not out, might be down, and that should be taken advantage of by us, and taken advantage of strongly. The NRA isn’t doing it, so we have to do it ourselves. Write to your members of the house and senate. I do, even it you expect negative results, like I do, you still need to let them know you are watching, and that the votes they take are not done in secret like they perhaps might want, but that they are done in broad daylight, and that we actually check the record, and then take the time on occasion to go and do it. A lot of it is mundane, but look up the bills that have real significance, and check them on those, and then write to them on those issues and let them how you feel about their votes, not only the bad but also the good. Get them used to hearing from you and to recognize your name. Then when an important issue comes up, and you once again write to them about it, your letter will have slightly more weight to it than someone who only wrote to them this one time. Make sure you are consistent, always respectful, but always be firm with them in that they will know that you won’t be swayed with some form letter with your name inserted into it. They were elected to serve us, make they do so, or make them realize that the bus runs both ways to D.C.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *