Somehow, this isn’t at all surprising.
Breaking: Newly Leaked Documents Reveal NYPD Assume Carrying a Firearm Illegal Until Proven Otherwise Despite SCOTUS Ruling
The New York Police Department (NYPD) treats all instances of concealed carry as an illegal act until it can be proven otherwise, according to newly leaked documents obtained by Project Veritas.New York is playing against a Supreme Court Ruling.
Specifically, they are playing again the very “specific” ruling in Bruen.
In keeping with Heller, we hold that when the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct.
“Presumptively.” They don’t get to — legally — presume the conduct is unlawful. They — legally — must presume carry is lawful unless and until proven otherwise.
But what else would you expect of constitutionally and judicially ignorant scumbags who also ignored this part…
That said, respondents’ attempt to characterize New York’s proper-cause requirement as a “sensitive-place” law lacks merit because there is no historical basis for New York to effectively declare the island of Manhattan a “sensitive place” simply because it is crowded and protected generally by the New York City Police Department.
… to declare the city a “sensitive place” piecemeal.
It will soon be forbidden to carry a firearm, even concealed, in the famed Times Square district and other public places in the city and state of New York, authorities announced on Wednesday.
Can someone point me to a citation saying the Supreme Court cannot issue bench warrants for “supreme” contempt of court?
Click here to donate via PayPal. (More Tip Jar Options) |
I keep waiting for the SCOTUS to have enough, and to do SOMETHING about the many states and cities ignoring the ruling issued in Bruen. Justice Thomas was quite emphatic and thorough in his majority opinion on the case, leaving little wiggle room for the expected cities and states to maneuver which he knew that they were likely to attempt.
I don’t know what the options are available to the Supreme Court, but I must assume that they have some power available to help enforce their rulings. It might be that they must rely on the executive branch to execute their rulings, in which case, they are basically screwed. Or the may be able to hold attorneys general in contempt of court, and somehow force them to account to them, while forcing them to step down until they have taken care of the SCOTUS issue.
There must be something that can be done about this issue, because it was certainly expected, but it must be stopped.