From the Firearms Policy Coalition:
If you know of anyone who manufactures, distributes, sells, bought, owns, or possesses a “bump-stock” type device, or you/they did manufacture, distribute, or sell “bump-stock” devices but no longer do because of the ATF’s proposed ban, they should contact the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) Legal Action Hotline at https://www.firearmspolicy.org/hotline AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. FPC and Firearms Policy Foundation have retained Firearms Industry Consulting Group attorneys to oppose the ATF’s unconstitutional and unlawful proposed ban on these devices. If the ATF’s proposed rule goes into effect, it would require the destruction of all such devices, nation-wide, or a possessor might face federal felony criminal penalties and the loss of rights. For more information on FPC and FPF’s efforts to oppose the ATF’s proposed “bump-stock” ban, please see “FPC/FPF Opposition to ATF’s Proposed Ban on Bump-Stock-Type Devices (docket no. 2017R-22)” at https://www.firearmspolicy.org/fpc-fpf-opposition-atf-bump-stock-ban.
Thank You.
I thought ex post facto laws were not allowed.
I think they drove the final stake through ex post facto when they passed the Lautenberg Amendment in 1996. I keep bringing that up, but not with any serious expectation that the courts will remember that’s specifically mentioned in the Constitution
Over 90,000 comments;
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2018/06/28/nearly-90000-comment-bump-stock-ban
100,939
https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=ATF-2018-0002-0001