NM: Governor Stalin Sending In The Thug Enforcers

Well, assuming she can find any State Police officers stupid enough to sign those citations and serve them.

Gov’s office promises State Police will enforce gun ban
Even without that physical presence, the governor’s office intends to act.

“The order is being enforced, and citations will be forthcoming from the State Police,” said Caroline Sweeny, a spokesperson for Lujan Grisham’s office. ”To ensure officer safety, we will not be providing additional details at this time.”

Multiple people were live streaming the event in Old Town which turned into an open-mic lasting several hours for anyone in attendance, mostly armed with at least one weapon, to share feelings, concerns and possible threats in reaction to the order.

It appears Grisham expects the Staties to identifying “offenders” from video, and cite them for violating her unconstitutional diktat. Reportedly the Albuquerque police did have a surveillance “device” set up for the even, as they seemingly often do. But given the police chief’s opposition to the ban order, it seems doubtful that he’d assist them by providing video or still shots.

But several people live-streamed the event, so the governor may just pull that off the Internet. It wouldn’t surprise me if she tries geofencing the protest; but that leaves her with proving that a particular cell phone was carried by an armed person.

Next, she has to find someone willing to put his name on the citations, and open himself up to the expected 18 U.S. Code § 241 – Conspiracy against rights and 18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law.

Finally, she needs a bunch of Staties brave and stupid enough to serve the unconstitutional citations on armed citizens.18 U.S. Code § 241 and 18 U.S. Code § 242, again.

Will the State Police do this? While the Bernalillo sheriff, Albuquerque police chief, and district attorney were quick to weigh in negatively, I’ve seen nothing as yet from the State Police.

The State Police web site is notably devoid of any contact data other than a physical address and a post office box; no telephone numbers, email addresses, or contact form (other than a way to compliment them). I finally located a contact form for the Department of Public Safety, under which the SP falls.

I sent this a few minutes ago.

Good day,

I am a firearms policy and law analyst for The Zelman Partisans. I have a few questions regarding enforcement of Governor Grisham’s and Secretary Allen’s action in banning public possession of firearms.

Given that the Albuquerque police chief, Bernalillo County sheriff, and the Albuquerque district attorney have all announced that they will not enforce the unconstitutional edict, is the New Mexico State Police going to enforce it, as Grisham has claimed?

Has the State Police considered the Second Amendment implication in light of the BRUEN decision test of general, historical legal tradition?

Has the State Police consider the ramifications of the NM state constitution, Sections 4 and 6?

If the State Police choose to enforce this, what action will you take against any officers who refuse to participate and open themselves up to 18 U.S. Code § 241 – Conspiracy against rights and 18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law charges?

Given that at least three groups have already filed lawsuits (NAGR, GOA, and FPC, I believe), are you willing to be added to the lawsuits?

Are individual State Police officers willing to be added to the lawsuits?

Thank you for your time. I look forward to your replies.

I’ll update if I receive a useful reply.

Facebooktwitterredditpinteresttumblrmail

2 thoughts on “NM: Governor Stalin Sending In The Thug Enforcers”

  1. I tend to be naive, as you are likely aware. However, it seems to me that a picture of someone holding what LOOKS like a firearm is not actual proof that the item they are holding is actually a real firearm and not some facsimile, that the person fashioned skillfully out of wood and steel, or polymer, but with no actual ability to act as a firearm.
    Unless the prosecution actually has their hands on said firearm, and is able to prove that it is a viable gun capable of firing a projectile, then simply having video of a person holding what “appears to be” an AR 15, a Glock 17, or some other type of well known firearm should not be any kind of proof that the person is actually violating the unlawful order of an out of touch politician.
    Then again, I doubt that any of these things will actually get as far as a court room, before the whole thing is tossed out. It is encouraging though, to see gun owners beginning to stand up and tell these politicians a firm and resounding NO! An American citizen should not be expected to follow an illegitimate law. Actually we have a duty to not follow it, and to protest against it’s enforcement.

    1. Hahaha! Naive my tuchous, PP51!!!
      Well said, & I couldn’t agree more….. yes, it is our duty to Not Comply with Unconstitutional & or Illegal orders.
      Thanks for posting your comments.

Comments are closed.