I’m not sure why The Gun Feed just picked up this 2017 story. But so long as they have, let’s look at some judicial stupidity. It never hurts to be ready to argue the next — inevitable — infringement case.
Assault Weapons Not Protected by Second Amendment, Federal Appeals Court Rules
“Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war,” Judge Robert King wrote for the court, adding that the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller explicitly excluded such coverage.
First, the assertion that HELLER “explicitly excluded” Second Amendment protection of “assault weapons” is such a gross misstatement of the decision that I can only consider King’s claim to be a blatant, intentional lie.
If it is indeed the case, as the District believes, that the number of guns contributes to the number of gun-related crimes, accidents, and deaths, then, although there may be less restrictive, less effective substitutes for an outright ban, there is no less restrictive equivalent of an outright ban.
HELLER found that less restrictive measures than an outright ban must be considered. Note especially that HELLER overturned the District’s outright ban on handguns. For the terminally clueless, they’re were specifying strict scrutiny.
At least dissenting Judge William Traxler got it.
“For a law-abiding citizen who, for whatever reason, chooses to protect his home with a semi-automatic rifle instead of a semi-automatic handgun, Maryland’s law clearly imposes a significant burden on the exercise of the right to arm oneself at home, and it should at least be subject to strict scrutiny review before it is allowed to stand.”
Yes; strict scrutiny, to weigh whether any lesser restriction than an outright ban would suffice to meet the government’s alleged interest.
But let us turn our attention to the other factor that King and the Fourth missed.
MILLER, 1939
The signification attributed to the term Militia appears from the debates in the Convention, the history and legislation of Colonies and States, and the writings of approved commentators. These show plainly enough that the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. ‘A body of citizens enrolled for military discipline.’ And further, that ordinarily when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time.
Required. And “common use” — note that the short-barreled shotgun test in question in MILLER specified common military use, not sporting use — would seem to apply to 20 MILLION AR-pattern weapons of the sort this very Court called “weapons of war.”
Common, militia-suitable arms.
It appears to me that ten injustices on the Fourth Circuit needed to be impeached; for sheer incompetence, if not outright malfeasance.
Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses. Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)
AMENDMENT XXIV – Passed by Congress August 27, 1962. Ratified January 23, 1964.
Section 1.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay poll tax or other tax.
So poll taxes to keep out the riffraff are back on the table?
AMENDMENT XXVI – Passed by Congress March 23, 1971. Ratified July 1, 1971.
Section 1.
The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.
Hmmm… Unless we red flag someone because he might vote irresponsibly? I suppose that could apply to the 16th Amendment as well.
Or maybe, just maybe… this is the one the “no right is absolute” crowd really have in mind.
AMENDMENT XIII – Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Hey, if we’re going to chuck the Constitution, why not go all out?
Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses. Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)
President Joe Biden said that for the last two decades guns have killed more children in the U.S. than “than on-duty police officers and active duty military combined.”
The Army Times reported 15,851 active duty military deaths… for 2006-2018. Do note that short period, somewhat less than 2000-2020. If we attempt to fill in the periods of 2000-2005 and 2019-2020, using Wikipedia, we get a total of 18,381 mil deaths.
The National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund lists 3,746 for 2000-2020. So we’re looking at a total of 22,127 military and LE deaths.
WISQARS says that, for 2000-2020, there were 4,547 firearm-related deaths (all intents) for 2-12yos (that FDA definition of “child”).
We already see that senile Gropin’ Joe is lying through his teeth. Again.
Let’s see what happens when we broaden the definition of child, and check that against WISQARS.
At last we exceed mil/LE deaths. If Xiden had claimed minors’ deaths, he might have a vague point. But he said “children.”
That’s quite an interesting jump in minors deaths when you include teenagers; and a jump of ten thousand when you include 17yos. Would I be out of line if I wondered if they should be looking at a gang problem, instead of guns?
And what would the mil/LE numbers look like if we limited those to people killed “by” (with, damnit) guns?
Biden’s puppeteers are manipulating and twisting data on “children” to inflict rights infringements on everyone, of all ages.
It could be (probably will be) worse. Everytown released a report using the term “youth” which astonishingly includes ten year-olds to…
24yos.
When I was 24, I’d been in the Air Force for five years; I was a Staff Sergeant, an NCOIC, and overseeing multi-million dollar contracts.
To Everytown, that’s the same as a 10yo child.
Whatever it takes to manipulate gullible minds.
Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses. Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)
Texas Congresscritter Sheila Jackson-Lee is generally good for entertaining stupidity, and this is no exception.
Jackson Lee: There Was ‘Seismic Increase of Carnage Across America Using Automatic Weapons’ after Assault Weapons Ban Expired
Jackson Lee said, “I have committed, over the years, having introduced bills dealing with the ban on assault weapons post-2004, as you well know, Ayman, that’s when it ended. And we saw the seismic increase of carnage across America using automatic weapons. And in the instance of Buffalo and the instance of Uvalde, having gone there on Sunday, meeting with and just listening to the sheer desperation of families and children. That was an AR-15 as well.”
I’m sure even the most casual TZP reader caught the main problem, but let me take this a point at a time.
I’ll start with that skyrocketing use of “automatic weapons, known legally as machineguns. Happily for us, TZP tracks machinegun use, so the data I want is readily available.
Right off, I hope you noticed that machinegun use is pretty darned rare. The next thing to notice is that prior to the misnomered “assault weapon ban” (it banned zero existing firearms) in 1994, there had been ONE reported machinegun use since 1981.
Next, note that after the “AWB” expired in 2004 there… huh, zero machine uses for the next 13 years.
That doesn’t look like much of a correlation between the AWB expiration and automatic weapon use. But do take a look between those red lines indicating when the AWB was in effect.
Three machinegun uses.
Lessee… virtually no machinegun uses prior to the ban, a “jump” (kinda statistically meaningless really, seeing as how small the samples are) during the ban, and a drop to nonexistent use once the ban expired. If I suffered a traumatic brain injury and turned into a Dimocrat, I’d probably think that the “assault weapon ban” caused machinegun use.
Heck, if I were a Dimocrat, I’d probably think the AWB caused machineguns.
But on to the point that probably had folks muttering before all that. I had recently had cause to revisit the “Assault Weapon Ban” of 1994. It didn’t address automatic weapons — machineguns — at all.
It shall be unlawful for a person to manufacture, transfer, or possess a semiautomatic assault weapon.
Machinegun use “increased” (though it didn’t) post-AWB? Jackson-Lee might as well have noted that US egg production increased post-AWB. At least that actually happened. But showing a cause and effect relation between the two might be a little difficult.
But Jackson-Lee’s real point is in that final sentence.
That was an AR-15 as well.
It was actually a Daniel Defense DDM4, not a Colt AR-15 (how many people realize that “AR-15” is a registered trademark of Colt?), but we understand that she’s attempting to “smear” all AR-pattern rifles as “automatic weapons”…
“The weapons’ menacing looks, coupled with the public’s confusion over fully automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons—anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun—can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons.”
The lie lives on. Along with this classic repeated by Jackson-Lee.
So, there’s a gathering around recognizing that assault weapons kill. They killed 19 children and two teachers.”
The known psycho wielding the rifle (singular) killed those people, with a rifle.
100+ million people with tens of millions of AR-pattern firearms DID NOT.
But blame the 0.000005% of inanimate objects for the actions of <0.000001% of gun owners.
Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses. Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)
“Who will say on this network or any other network in the next few days, ‘It’s time to repeal the Second Amendment?’”
Bad idea, Lardo Calrissian.
You can’t repeal the Second Amendment, any more than you can repeal any of the other nine. It was a package deal, you see, an absolute prerequisite to ratifying the main body of the Constitution. Repeal one, you repeal them all. Do that, and you repeal the whole Constitution — and with it, any legal authority that the government has to exist (let alone repeal the Second Amendment).
— Alexander Hope
That comes from chapter five of Hope, by Aaron Zelman and L. Neil Smith. The style makes me think that particular passage was penned by Neil (and it seems like he had a stand-alone essay to the same effect), but I don’t believe Aaron would have let that go into their co-authored novel unless he agreed with it.
As a casual student of history, who has read much about the ratification of the Constitution, I also agree.
Lose one, lose them all. Lose it all.
I suspect that Moore, and most Dims currently in DC — and far too many Repugnicans, as well — would be happy to lose the few remaining Constitutional limits on their power. They don’t particularly care about “legal authority;” just power.
The problem is… if our wanna-be tyrants are no longer restrained by that pesky Constitution, neither are the people.
The people pissed off at senseless bans, and illegal ballot drop boxes, might just decide that turning to constitutionally-enabled courts — who already defecate on individual rights at the slightest provocation — really isn’t necessary.
Voting out scumbags, and voting in new replacement scumbags who promise to use KY while screwing us? Why bother with that discarded constitutional process? Wouldn’t high-velocity lead be cheaper and faster? Not to mention proactively educating would-be replacements.
Court-blessed “constitutional” takings of property? Get rid of the Constitution and former property owners might resort to ex-constitutional re-takings, enforced with ropes and lamp posts.
Lose one, lose them all. Moore himself might want to consider the ramifications of chucking his First Amendment protections to defame folks for a buck. The people might decide, lacking that lost constitutional recourse, to go bowling for lying documentarians.
Get rid of the Constitution, and the people’s pretend recourse… and they might stop pretending they do.
Maybe the tyrants will be counting on the out-numbered police to prop up their post-Constitution regime. How many officers would continue to be willing to do that once they’ve lost “constitutional” sovereign immunity, and the people know it?
Perhaps the Constitution has only been an illusory paper restraint on government. But it has been a potent symbolic restraint on the people, preventing them from eliminating abusive politicians and government agents out of hand. I do not truly comprehend the willingness — nay, the eagerness of the Left to go there, to surrender that protection, given the likely consequences.
We’d be starting from scratch, with new rules written by the survivors.
Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses. Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)
That’s only at the federal level, Escobar. I suppose it’ll come as a shock to your tiny, ill-informed — yet somehow still legislating — pseudo-mind that every state, territory, federal district, civilian and military installation has their own additional.
Individual counties, cities, and towns pile on their own laws and regulations.
I think we may have just a few regulations on guns.
If you wish to contact Dimwit Escobar, to explain the statutory and regulatory facts of life to, you can contact her office HERE. Be aware that Escobar is one of those tyrannical types who likes to vote on national legislation, but is grossly afraid of national feedback. Her contact form requires you to enter a ZIP+4 within her district to pass “Go.”
79901-1443 should work, for those of you affected by her idiocy but not resident in her district.
Have fun.
Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses. Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)
He thinks it’s a problem with those lawfully carrying firearms.
If you are allowing people to carry guns, the good guys are no longer able to be distinguished from the bad guys because if you have a bad day, and you have a gun, that bad day can elevate to an argument.
There’s a tendency that people believe if they got a gun, ‘Why have it, if I’m not using it?’ That’s just the mindset of carrying a gun.
The problem here isn’t honest folks carrying guns. It’s Mayor Adams,
Adams believes that carrying a gun for defense means you’re suddenly going to snap, to start shooting because you’re having a bad day.
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another.
Here’s a reality check, Mayor; cash it:
Those people who go to the trouble of lawfully carrying a firearm for defense rarely “snap.” Based on personal experience, conversations with other carriers, reading, and firearms classes, the opposite is the case.
We aren’t carrying because we hope to kill someone. If I can make it through my life without ever having to do that, I’d be happy.
Because we know from education and training that actually firing a gun anywhere but a range, or hunting, can bring down a load of legal and moral pain, we are more likely to attempt to deescalate a situation, rather than default to Kill ’em all; let G-d sort ’em out.
We carry defensively because we value life, even that of a scumbag… up to the point that such a creature forces us to prioritize one life over his.
I’ve been carrying firearms, professionally and personally, for over forty years. Not once have I ever thought He’s annoying me. I have a gun. Why not just put the bastard out of my misery?
I have been in situations where the thought Oh please don’t make me draw has gone through my mind.
But Mayor Adams seems incapable of that mindset, or even granting that someone else might have that I-don’t-want-to-shoot-anyone mindset.
That appears to leave Adams with the Oh, g-d; I’m gonna kill someone mindset. He knows it, and assumes everyone else is like himself.
On an intellectual level, I’m curious as to how he can live with that sort of self-loathing. But, really, I don’t want those sort of destructive — of self and others — thoughts in my head.
I suppose this is why people like Adams can support no-due process “red flag” laws, and other forms of victim disarmament. They know damned well that they themselves should probably be red-flagged and disarmed. For cause.
Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses.Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)
Yeah…You know, I’ve heard from people on the right and left, via radio, TV and just people that Putin is “crazy”. Crazed madman, crazed from covid. I’m not so sure.
I still haven’t figured out how President Puddin’head handing over US sovereignty isn’t treason, but few others are saying it, so guess his puppeteers figure he’s in the clear. What will that entail? Well, since he’s handing it over to the W.H.O., here’s a previews.
WHO is Set to Officially Recommend Every Country Adopt COVID Lockdowns in Abrupt Change to Policy. I listened to a radio show today and one of the things they talked about what how the W.H.O. had objected to the lockdowns, stating the cost of them in terms of harm could yield greater damage than the disease. As indeed it did. But the lockdown was never about health, it was about power. And what is the new threat on the horizon now that President Putin has cured covid?
MONKEYPOX!! The “k” is silent. But don’t fret, President Puddin’head is right one it! After a case in Massachusetts his puppeteers have ordered millions of doses of “vaccine”. And how big a threat is Moneypox?
Do you wonder what it will look like when the US is under the control of the W.H.O.? Did you know the World Economic Forum has their own paramilitary police force? Political commentator Jack Posobiec found out today when he was at Davos. He had passport, papers and press pass and still got hauled behind a building. Apparently things deescalated some when another blogger showed up and started filming. Kind of reminds me of the goons in Canada during the Trucker’s freedom convoy in unmarked uniforms. The reason we aren’t Canada right now is the Second Amendment.
World Economic Forum’s Stasi
What always follows pandemics? Famine, which is followed by war. With President Puddin’head’s puppeteers policies we are well on the way. Soaring inflation, soaring gas prices, no baby formula and President Puddin’head’s FDA kept the Abbott factory closed, and they have yanked more permits for drilling. Then there are the Russian sanctions, ah yes. Those much vaunted sanctions. Any idea where the majority of the wheat comes from? Russia and Ukraine. India has announced they are not going to export any except to maybe needy nations. Congress is sending more 140 some billion more to Ukraine, while denying money to small American businesses. Must be some reason.
Partners in crime?
So this will drag on in Ukraine, and this is not about the Ukrainian people who don’t want to live under communism, who does? Besides people who think they will end up at the top of the heap like Bernie Sanders and AOC.
But with war continuing in Ukraine, and sanctions against Russia I wouldn’t be looking for a surplus of bread any time soon.
So, with President Puddin’head’s puppeteers proclaiming a new (and improved) coming pandemic how many will fall for it? I listened to a very interesting podcast with Mattis DeSmet today, the topic was mass formation, or group think if you will. https://jermwarfare.com/blog/mattias-desmet
One of the things Professor Desmet said is those who have not bought into the hive mind, or group think have got to keep speaking out. He talked about a show he did recently and he said he got so much mail from people that said while they were listening to the show, it was like they were waking up and they could see where their previous thought processes had been off. He felt our best chance of saving at least some of them (the cult covidians) was to keep speaking out. But it’s about saving ourselves as well from the things they will demand the government do to us in the name of “safety”.
Which leads me to my next point, speaking out.
This censorship of Russia, and anything Russian. RT news in America recently shut down. Well, with the services canceling them, I can see why. Al Jeezera still on? Just checking. Another podcast was with a former reporter for RT news, and it was pretty interesting. She talked about the freedom she had as a journalist working for them. That she had been free to pursue some stories she would never have been allowed to cover on FOX or CNN. The interview was about the hate that had been directed at her personally since February. It’s also available on Spotify. Jerm Warfare. The interview is Rachel Blevins. I know, lots of listening today, what can I say? I was working on a mower.
But the level of censorship and hatred directed at President Putin (who I still do not think is a nice guy) is usually reserved for American doctors who had cheap easily available cures for corona virus. And in fact, can be used for other viruses. It is usually reserved for people that try to submit evidence that there was massive cheating in the 2020 elections. That much hatred directed at a man who is head of a communist country? The rabid left loves communism, so this is very odd. What is it the American oligarchs don’t want the citizens to hear? I heard (but not confirmed) Russia did not lock down their citizens nor was there a vax mandate. Are they afraid we’re going to compare death statistics? I don’t know, but there is some reason for this.
They have continued to blame Putin for election interference, for gas price spikes, for rising prices and probably the heartbreak of psoriasis! Vice President Word Salad shows up in Ukraine urging them to join NATO, and the media claims the US gave information to the Ukraine to sink the Russian warship and to target Russian Generals. Then Ginger Goebbels Psaki trots out and says it’s not true. Now, if the majority of American citizens know she lies like a cheap rug….I’m guessing Putin might have a clue as well. The Bull Durham investigation has shown there was no Russian interference, Crooked Hillary cooked it all up. (Prayers for Robbie Mook at this trying time). The disgraced and discredited FIB and CIA apparently “couldn’t” figure it out. I want my tax dollars back. Now we have RINO Romney, Mitt Romney Calls on NATO to Prepare for Potential Russian Nuclear Strikes. Well, lets see, we have millions of people in the US now and we have no clue who they are, so. Of course Romney has a pony in the race, his son as well as Pelosi’s, Kerry’s and of course Biden’s are all involved in the Ukraine. The country the IMF ranks as one of the corrupt. You know, it’s interesting, I don’t speak Russian, I know not that much about Russia, although someone did tell me on Shabbat that Putin has made it better for the Jews, but some of the videos I’ve seen on GAB (who don’t censor) have English subtitles and according the videos it is the Russians who have been helping the Ukrainian citizens more, and some of the atrocities have been Ukrainian. I dunno, I don’t speak either language.
But the point here is, everything President Puddin’head’s puppeteers and his corrupt friends in the pub party have been doing are set to provoke and poke the Russian bear, and harm American citizens. If you really think Putin is crazy, why are you doing that? You don’t poke crazy. One of the shows I listened to today, I’m not sure which one, pointed out that Putin had set down a set of items that Russia wouldn’t tolerate. They said he had been clear and had been saying it for a long time. It’s not like he just woke up cranky one morning and out of the blue decided to take a jaunt into Ukraine. Somehow I don’t hear much conversation about that though.
Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action. We are well past that with President Puddin’head.
Keeping your friends close can be a challenge
We are at an unprecedented place in American history. The forces allied against us, U.S. are without and within. And the within are the worst of the lot. I think the leaders of almost (if not all) of the world’s countries right now are corrupt, and I think they are determined to pit us against one another because if we figured out we all pretty much want the same thing (I’m leaving Islam out of this, by the way, that’s a whole nother kettle of fish) then we might decide we just prefer to get along, work together and live in peace. And so I’ll leave you with a thought from Rabbi Nachman of Breslov (in Ukraine) and a story from Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak of Lubavitch.
“At this point, in this closely-divided Congress, do you see any appetite right now to take up, once again, the idea of an assault weapons ban in this country?”
The question was clearly a pre-planned softball for the half-witted Dim. The scumbag reportedly used a NY SAFE Act-compliant Bushmaster XM-15 rifle; a non-“assault weapon.”
The ditz still flubbed it.
We need to do something about making sure that bad guys don’t get their hands on handguns.
The context was the Buffalo shooting. He did not use a handgun; it was a NY SAFE Act-compliant Bushmaster XM-15 rifle.
And we need to make sure that these assault and automatic weapons don’t get in the hands of bad guy
One more time, moron: It was not an “assault weapon.” It was not an automatic weapon (something even NY Gov. Hochul could figure out).
And now we enter the Twilight Zone. Picking up where she left off…
And we need to make sure that these assault and automatic weapons don’t get in the hands of bad guys, and sometimes, bad women. Because, again, I’ve been rabbit hunting.
-blink- Um, what? Let’s simplify that.
We need to get guns out of the hands of bad women because I’ve been rabbit hunting.
Aaaall righty, then.
So now I come to the questions I think Garcia should answer.
1. Are you on drugs?
Because you sound like you’re on drugs. And not prescription goodies. On the other hand…
2. If you are not on drugs, should you be? (The prescription sort, this time.)
3. If neither recreational nor prescription pharmaceuticals were involved, is your stupidity natural or the result of an accident?
I could add a fourth question prompted by this:
Handguns, in my view, are not for hunting. They’re not for protection. I think handguns are, frankly, for killing people.
Oddly enough, I have never killed anyone with a handgun. I even bought one large-bore handgun specifically for hunting. I have used a handgun for defense. So…
4. Are my non-killing handguns defective, and should I demand refunds?
The first three questions were submitted to Garcia’s office. They did not respond to multiple emails.
Go figure.
Carl is an unpaid TZP volunteer. If you found this post useful, please consider dropping something in his tip jar. He could really use the money, what with ISP bills, site hosting and SSL certificate, new 2021 model hip, and general life expenses. Click here to donate via PayPal.
(More Tip Jar Options)
As you may, or not, have heard, the JoBama crime regime is on the verge of handing over U.S. sovereignty to the W.H.O. You know, I always figured it would be the U.N. that would be the issue, and I do believe they will play a role as the W.H.O.’s enforcers, but it will be the corrupt W.H.O. with their oligarch benefactors that will be running the show.
It seems when the elections of 2020 were corrupted by the demoncrats and their allies in the corporate media and technology, a series of planned events began like the falling of a domino. See the movie 2000 Mules for evidence on this one. Dinesh D’Souza, doing the job American “journalists” , cough cough, choke choke, won’t do.
These regulations are a “binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007.”3 U.N. members states can be required by law to obey or acquiesce to them.
There are many groups and people that believe the Covid-19 flu was timed and/or engineered to affect our elections. This group has a lot of good information on their web site to back up the claim, and a video. Members are doctors, lawyers, and others who have been fighting the use of covid to seize freedom from citizens of every country. https://stopworldcontrol.com/. You must admit, ordering all those covid-19 test kits a year or two ahead of the actual pandemic is amazing. Apparently, Miss Cleo is back in biz. So, there is a domino. If you just want to see the video they’ve put together giving evidence on why they believe the pandemic was planned, that’s here.
On May 22-28, 2022, ultimate control over America’s healthcare system, and hence its national sovereignty, will be delivered for a vote to the World Health Organization’s governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).
This threat is contained in new amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations, proposed by the Biden administration, that are scheduled as “Provisional agenda item 16.2” at the upcoming conference on May 22-28, 2022.1
These amendments will empower WHO’s Director-General to declare health emergencies or crises in any nation and to do so unilaterally and against the opposition of the target nation. The Director-General will be able to declare these health crises based merely on his personal opinion or consideration that there is a potential or possible threat to other nations.
If passed, the Biden Administration’s proposed amendments will, by their very existence and their intention, drastically compromise the independence and the sovereignty of the United States. The same threat looms over all the U.N.’s 193 member nations, all of whom belong to WHO and represent 99.44% of the world population.2
These regulations are a “binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007.”3 U.N. members states can be required by law to obey or acquiesce to them.
….
Although sponsored by an American administration, WHO’s most significant use of this arbitrary authority to declare national emergencies will be used against the United States if our government ever again dares to take anti-globalist stands as it did under the Trump administration.
Because this treaty was originally signed in 2007, I don’t believe this needs to go through the approval process again. This is “just” amendments from the JoBama crime regime. And another domino bites the dust.
Here’s a bit about those amendments from Leo Hohmann:
According to the WHO’s website, on March 30, 2021, 25 world leaders announced an “urgent call for an International Pandemic Treaty,” stating that such a treaty is needed to orchestrate a single globalized response to pandemics. These “25 heads of government and international leaders” have come together in a joint call to form the treaty.
Don’t forget that Yuval Noah Harari, the chief advisor to Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum, has stated that globalist elites will use “crises” to bring about world government.
“Catastrophe opens the door” to massive changes that people would otherwise never accept, Harari said.
But even more pressing than the treaty itself right now, is something almost no one is paying attention to in U.S. political, religious or media circles, and that involves a set of amendments that will amend an existing treaty, the International Health Regulations. The U.S. government has submitted amendments to 13 articles within those regulations, which are administered by the WHO, and these amendments are seen by many as sovereignty killers.
A UN report from May 2021 called for more powers for the WHO stating that, “In its current form, the WHO does not possess such powers […]To move on with the treaty, WHO therefore needs to be empowered — financially, and politically.“
The WHO will be hosting its annual meeting, the 75th World Health Assembly, May 22-28 in Geneva, Switzerland, attended by delegates from at least 194 nations. It is during this Assembly that members will be voting on the amendments that will hand over additional sovereignty, control and legal authority to the World Health Organization. The WHO, if these amendments are approved, will obtain the authority to declare an international health emergency, overriding national governments.
Now one might think, why on earth would the President of the United States, leader of the free nation, want to turn over sovereignty of the country to an un-elected bunch of bureaucrats that haven’t been correct about much of anything about covid-19. Why, this would leave his citizens no recourse to whatever tyranny the corrupt Tedros (owned and installed by China, much as JoBama was) decided to force on them?
But you get to go to heaven!
No word yet if Vladimir Putin will be handing over Russian sovereignty to a globalist cabal or not. But gosh, I guess if he didn’t, it would be like the whole world (almost) would be united against Russia. But, you wouldn’t think the whole world would unite against one nation just because they made a different choice. A choice they felt was in the best interest of their citizens, their families, would you? Seems a horrible way to thank Putin for curing covid, right? And one day after I write this, we know the answer Russia Moves To Withdraw From WTO, WHO
Yeah, at this point I’d believe it. I mean look at how people treated those that for some reason or another chose not to take the experimental gene therapy injections? This is just on a far grander scale. Fellow write Y.B. Ben Avraham sent me a fascinating article. Letter to the Menticided: A 12-Step Recovery Program
“Menticide is an old crime against the human mind and spirit but systematized anew. It is an organized system of psychological intervention and judicial perversion through which a powerful dictator can imprint his own opportunistic thoughts upon the minds of those he plans to use and destroy.”
* * *
“Ready made opinions can be distributed day by day through press, radio, and so on, again and again, till they reach the nerve cell and implant a fixed pattern of thought in the brain. Consequently, guided public opinion is the result, according to Pavlovian theoreticians, of good propaganda technique, and the polls a verification of the temporary successful action of the Pavlovian machinations on the mind.”
~~Joost Meerloo, The Rape of the Mind
The whole thing is well worth reading, but one of the videos embedded explains so well why I believe that many people in the U.S. will go along with this treaty, beg for it, just like they do to have experimental injections put into their innocent children as they sacrifice them on the alter of the Golden Fauxci Molech.
We aren’t really dealing with evil people per se, but stupid ones. And they are more dangerous to us, U.S. After years of public education, corporate media, dumbed down entertainment and equity as opposed to equality in outcomes, this is what we are up against, the side against freedom and law abiding citizens.
Now, the politicians? They aren’t necessarily stupid, they are sadistic and power greedy. I enjoy war correspondent Michael Yon’s columns. His insight from what I’ve read and heard him say is pretty accurate. His take on the Biden crime regime? You are being too generous if you attribute this to incompetence. The Myth of “If Only He knew,” or “When he finds out this will end…”
It seems Dr. Martinson has come around to a paradigm more aligned with my own. This is not incompetence. They know what they are doing. This is war.
Old proverbs and sayings can be very useful branches, thought-shortcuts, to help just get to accurate answers quickly. But those same sayings can be traps. This is one reason it’s better to use a dumb Bloodhound while tracking men than to use a very smart Border Collie.
Firstly, the Bloodhound has a better nose — AND USES IT. The Bloodhound just follows the facts that its senses detect. Follows the evidence. Border Collies often follow their memories. Lassie (well, not a Border Collie) remembers the last man she found was in a ditch, and so Lassie runs around checking all the ditches. Lassie was last seen disappearing over the horizon checking a long ditch.
Lassie is using the equivalent shortcut of “never attribute to malice that which can be attributed to incompetence.” And they look with those brilliant eyes barking, “See! I know the shortcut to wisdom!” Meanwhile, the dumb Bloundhound in the last hour found a missing child, tree’d a kidnapper, got on the trail of a female Bloodhound, and sired a new litter all while Lassie is still running down the ditches knowing she’s going to get that guy. Lassie tracks with her eyes and memory. Bloodhound tracks the available evidence and is equivalent to a weapon’s system.
The evidence is clear. We are under attack. When I say this, the Lassies typically say, “Never attribute to malice what can be found in a ditch.”
….
I am down here in Panama and can say with clarity that comes dry season in December/January when the Darien jungles are easier to cross when famine is ripping across Africa and many other places, we may see literally millions of people come through here and blow right across the US borders.
Baby formula? Lol. You can take the Haitians out of Haiti but some of these thugs will be taking homes by force.
The whole column is worth reading, really.
So the W.H.O. has the power to decide what and when a pandemic is, and can use the U.N. to enforce the nations to do what the W.H.O. says. So, like the CDC used to yammer on about an “epidemic of gun violence”, well then, that would be right up the W.H.O.’s ally wouldn’t it?
So, there is a petition you can sign, but this travesty starts in just a couple of days.
According to Dr. Tess Lawrie, there may be another chance to have input.
According to the WHO, the next round of written and video public participation in the pandemic treaty will take place on 16-17 June.
Have you ever wondered why the power crazy demoncrats haven’t backed off of any of their disastrous plans and policies that have hurt American citizens at every turn? I mean you hear Republicans talking about a “red wave” in the fall, and while it’s true Blacks and Hispanics are fleeing the power drunk dims, don’t you get the feeling there is a reason the dims aren’t backing off? It’s almost as though they think they don’t have to worry about “red waves”, fall or elections. They are just trying to get as many pieces in place as quickly as they can. Enough pieces that there is no coming back.
Whether there is a way or not, I do not know. I know that G-d determines outcomes, but there are very few fantastic achievements I’ve ever seen that didn’t require some amount of effort on the part of the person submitting those prayers. And I think lots and lots of prayers on in order. Because what it is, is tyranny on a scale we’ve never seen, and the last domino just dropped.
Jews. Guns. No compromise. No surrender.
Password Reset
Please enter your e-mail address. You will receive a new password via e-mail.
