Take them out with what?

During an interview on “60 Minutes” recently, Washington DC Police Chief Cathy Lanier said something surprising – at least to those of us who have followed her anti-freedom, gun-grabbery over the years. When asked about what DC citizens should do if an active shooter threatens them during a siege like the one that took place in Paris a couple of weeks ago, Lanier, whom I have previously described as the DC Dominatrix due to her heavy-handed hatred of gun rights and Second Amendment freedoms, replied “If you’re in a position to try to take the gunman down, to take the gunman out, it’s the best option for saving lives before police can get there,”

Take them out for what? Coffee? A drink?

Despite being spanked in the courts several times, DC still has some of the nation’s most stringent gun control laws. Fox News reports that of 233 applications sent for review since the Metropolitan Police Department began accepting permits on Oct. 23, 2014, 185 licenses had been denied as of Nov. 14.

GettyImages-474248390-e1434470938562Lanier has the final say about who can have guns in the city, and it looks like there are exactly 48 people in the entire city who have been granted permission to exercise their Second Amendment rights. Open carry is prohibited, and concealed carry is nearly nonexistent, with only 44 concealed carry applications having been approved since October 23, 2014.  Virginia residents certainly can’t legally carry their tools of self defense in the city, and if they do, they risk arrest and having their lives destroyed by the very same police force whose head is now claiming that citizens need to be the ones who stand up to the horror!

So whom does Lanier expect to take up arms against terrorists until the cops can get there?

She certainly seems to be admitting that armed citizens are the first line of defense against attacks, and yet she refuses to free the residents of the nation’s capital to exercise their rights.

Such shocking cognitive dissonance from someone who is responsible for the safety and security of America’s capital! I wonder if the attacks in Paris were a wake-up call for Lanier, but somehow I doubt it.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinteresttumblrmail

4 thoughts on “Take them out with what?”

  1. Cognitive dissonance is a luxury for most folks – you pretty much need to be ‘immune’ from what you’re ‘dissonance-ing’ about. But for people in positions of authority, when the result is that we peons will suffer, that is not luxury, it’s malfeasance. She should be removed from office for telling unarmed people to attack armed terrorists. All she’ll do is get them killed, and then use that as an excuse to continue to oppose gun ownership.

  2. She expects us to do it like those guys on the French train, some weeks ago. She’s OK with us taking hits because we are disarmed, but that’s as helpful as she gets. I’ll keep her advice in mind, especially when I need a laugh.

    Cops. What would we do without ’em?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *