Kyle Rittenhouse is being sued by the the idiot who chased him down and pointed a gun at him.
Kyle Rittenhouse hit with lawsuit from man he shot during 2020 Kenosha clash: ‘Little bit of a shock’
Gaige Grosskreutz, who testified he pointed a firearm at Rittenhouse before the then-teenager shot Grosskreutz and two others, is seeking economic losses, “damages for emotional distress, humiliation, loss of enjoyment of life, and other pain and suffering on all claims,” and punitive damages.
I could talk about the basic stupidity of suing a person after you already testified under oath that he shot you only after you threatened to kill him by pointing an unlawfully possessed handgun at him. But that’s a little too obvious.
I want to talk about a comment on that report.
He went looking for trouble armed with a gun and found it. Have can keep dealing with the consequences.
“toatsrokinit” seems to think he’s talking about Kyle acting provocatively. But his claim very much more accurately describes the actions of plaintiff Grosskreutz.
Kyle was there cleaning up graffiti and offering medical first aid to protesters.
Grosskreutz was there to protest.
Kyle ran from threats, and only shot is self defense.
Grosskreutz chased Kyle and pointed a gun at him while Kyle was down on the ground.
And note: Grosskreutz was “armed with a gun,” and in chasing Kyle was definitely “looking for trouble.”
Also note: Kyle’s rifle possession was lawful.
Grosskreutz’s concealed pistol possession was unlawful.
And yet the morons who still insist — without any evidence beyond “cuz I said so” — that Kyle was carrying that rifle “looking for trouble,” never seem to wonder about Grosskreutz. And why he was unlawfully armed.
The guy who effed around and found out.
Gab Pay link (More Tip Jar Options) |
