It appears the Biden crime regime is waging a war against law-abiding citizens who are Second Amendment supporters by attacking them on First Amendment grounds. Yes indeed Barry Sotero is enjoying his third term via his favorite sock puppet the corrupt Joe Biden, so Biden is carrying on Barry’s proud tradition of using government to attack citizens by force, with lies and with government agencies gone rogue.
They went so far as to physically attack January 6th attendees. We know that incompetent, corrupt (and now promoted) Michael Byrd murdered Ashli Babbit.
Julie Kelly has been covering the trials going on for the January 6th political prisoners, and she’s been pointing out the absolute travesty of justice going on.
BREAKING: Judge Tim Kelly just made destruction of part of a temporary metal fence on govt property a federal crime of terrorism.
Said removal of fence was part of the Proud Boys “conspiracy” to “influence the conduct of government.”
This dramatically increases base level of jail time for Joe Biggs and Kelly no doubt will do the same for the other Proud Boys.
Knew it was coming but still flabbergasted.
She also has pointed out that the “judge” in the President Trump trial in the banana republic formerly known as the USA is far from being an acceptable judge.
Chutkan comes from a family of influential Jamaican Marxists.
In addition to her bias against the January Six defendants, she was appointed by Barack Obama. He nominated the most radical judges he could find.
She also worked at the same law firm as Hunter. Let’s just say, for argument’s sake, that she can be impartial; what about her past with Burisma and her former law firm representing Fusion GPS? She didn’t recuse herself when the Fusion case came up until she was found out the day before the proceedings.
She has referred to defendants as insurrectionists, and her sentences were the harshest of the judges.
Trump judge says defense should have started BEFORE indictment!
Now Kelly is out with a new report about a hearing before Chutkan, and “it’s worse than reported.”
NEW: I have transcript from today’s hearing before Judge Chutkan and it’s worse than reported.
Chutkan marveled at Jack Smith’s rapid “discovery” production while downplaying fact DOJ could not name a single case in DC District that went from indictment to trial in 5 months: pic.twitter.com/pAxcBlv7dv
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 29, 2023
President Trump was correct when he said they weren’t really after him, he was just in the way of them coming after U.S.
So January 6th fedsentation (a lot like a presentation staged by feds) stopped the challenges to the fraudulent election that were going to be presented. The people (except for the feds, corrupt cops and antifa) that had gone there, had gone to express their grievances, something that is allowed by law. Unlike BLM they didn’t riot or burn cities, no, others presenting themselves as Trump supporters did that.
They have no problem with stifling free speech, that became crystal clear during the covid fiasco. Nor do they have a problem stifling free speech to keep you from defending yourself or others. Such as lawyers. Rules and laws no longer apply to the left.
The weaponized DOJ is also determined to disarm law-abiding citizens. Pawshawwww, pesky Constitution. Why worry about that when you have the Department of Veteran’s Affairs…again.
This outrages me as these are men and women who were willing to place their life on the line for our country. And they basically stand to lose human rights (self-defense) because they didn’t balance their checkbook?
New Bill Would Stop VA Bureaucrats From Gaming The System To Grab Veterans’ Guns
The legislation, introduced on Friday by Reps. Roy, Eli Crane of Arizona, Lance Gooden of Texas, Andrew Clyde of Georgia, Andy Harris of Maryland, and Mary Miller of Illinois, specifically bars the VA from sending veterans’ names to the Department of Justice to be added to the federal government’s no-gun list.
….
FBI data from 2023 shows that nearly 98 percent of the names placed in the NICS “mental defective” category by federal agencies were handed over to the FBI by the VA.
….
A memo released by House Veteran Affairs Committee Chairman Mike Bost notes that the decision to name a fiduciary and disarm veterans is often made by “VA general schedule employees, not a court or similar judicial authority.” There is an appeals process for veterans who want “relief of firearms prohibitions imposed by the law” but whether or not that relief is granted is once again determined by the VA.
And if disarming them via government agency isn’t sufficient, they’ll just have a government agency shoot you, stone cold, graveyard dead.
On August 9th in Provo Utah an elderly senior citizen, Craig Robertson was killed in his home. My comments come are in regards to the following article. Apparently the basically home-bound elderly man who took care of his visually impaired son had grown dissatisfied with the Biden Crime Regime’s continual attacks on our country, it’s citizens, borders, way of life and Constitution.
The FBI Claims Disabled Trump Supporter Who Was Killed in Morning Raid Had Pulled a Gun on Agents
According to an email from FBI spokeswoman Sandra Barker, Craig Robertson “resisted arrest and as agents attempted to take him into custody, he pointed a .357 revolver at them.”
Despite this assertion, the agency hasn’t presented any corroborating evidence. When questioned about photographic or video proof of Mr. Robertson’s alleged action, Ms. Barker refrained from commenting.
Yeah, maybe so, maybe not. The FIB seems to lie about everything these days. I wouldn’t trust them if they told me it’s still Summer. But what the neighbors had to say was pretty interesting as well. What is it with the FIB and these early morning in the dark raids? It’s almost like they are trying to provoke a response to an intruder. Why don’t they walk up to the door at noon, just knock and say “We’d like a word, please”. And this over the top tactical team crap is ridiculous.
His social media also showcased support for former President Donald Trump, displayed tactical equipment, and boasted an expansive firearm collection. Neighbors estimated he owned about 20 guns.
In Texas isn’t that called a neophyte or hobbyist?
During the warrant execution before sunrise, officers employed flash bangs to get Robertson to leave his house. When he refused, alleging innocence, gunshots ensued around 6:15 a.m. local time, as per Jon Michael Ossola, a witnessing neighbor.
Subsequent local accounts state that Robertson was pulled out of his home, where he succumbed to his injuries on the sidewalk, concealed beneath a sheet.
Other neighbors had more to say, so this is kind of out of order from the article.
Another neighbor, Katie Monson, recounted to The Associated Press how agents unsuccessfully tried to breach Mr. Robertson’s door with a battering ram, then used a tactical vehicle. After hearing shots, she saw officers pulling Robertson outside.
A battering ram and a tactical vehicle for a 75 year old disabled man?? Seriously? And about them shooting at Robertson…
The incident escalated when Robertson reportedly aimed a firearm at law enforcement, prompting what witnesses called a “hail of bullets” at his Provo home.
Aimed, not discharged. It’s still dark and he answers the door with a gun in his hand…again, why not noon, knock on the door, and say “We’d like a word”.
Neighbors have said he was a decent guy. Understandably his family is distraught. Family of Trump supporter Craig Robertson shot dead in FBI raid breaks silence
His relatives said Robertson — who they described as a “firearm enthusiast, collector and gunsmith” — loved the US “with all his heart” but had become increasingly disappointed by the Biden administration.
“He was understandably frustrated and distraught by the present and on-going erosions to our constitutionally protected freedoms and the rights of free citizens wrought by what he, and many others in this nation, observed to be a corrupt and overreaching government,” the statement said.
“As an elderly — and largely homebound — man, there was very little he could do but exercise his First Amendment right to free speech and voice his protest in what has become the public square of our age — the internet and social media.
Did he say things he ought not have said? Obviously.
Sen. Mike Lee is looking into the murder of Mr. Robertson. Mike Lee says elements of Provo FBI raid were ‘highly unusual,’ calls for ‘serious’ investigation
This article lists the things off the top of Sen. Lee’s head that were odd. The question came up at a townhall meeting.
My point is, this murder seems to be part of a bigger picture attack on U.S. citizens by various and sundry arms of the Biden crime regime’s captured agencies.
Before the pre-dawn attack on Mr. Robertson, why was the FIB even there?? Because he posted a threat on a social media platform? Because he objected to the erosion of our liberties in the banana republic so the Biden crime regime decided to prove him wrong by murdering him for using freedom of speech? You know, presumably the FIB could do some basic, oh I don’t know, investigation and find out the man is basically home-bound, disabled and 75 freaking years old??? Maybe talk to some neighbors?? You know, investigate? But why do that when you can use all your tacti-cool toys, right? When I took my concealed carry class 153,000 years ago I remember one of the things taught was if you had to be involved in a self-defense shooting, there needed to be three elements.
“I call it the J.A.M. elements,” said Jamison, who also teaches courses on gun laws and safety at Great Guns gun shop in Liberty. J.A.M. roughly translates to jeopardy, ability and means. “First, is the person being placed in jeopardy? Does the person making the threats have the ability to carry out the threat? And third, does he have the means to carry out the threat?” he said.
I would maintain that the elderly home-bound 75 year old caring for his visually disabled son may have lacked some of those elements. I think the FIB case is more like jelly than J.A.M. and that’s what Mr. Robertson was executed for, freedom of speech.
